Harvard student to be deported from US?

<p>

</p>

<p>Of course the class of 2013 would still be an outstanding group. Of course the person admitted in place of Eric (or whomever) would still be talented and a contribution to the campus. I am not proposing that those who received Harvard acceptance letters in April 2009 are the only people who could thrive in a Harvard environment. I’m merely saying that, in the eyes of Harvard admissions, those people were the best choices and by that very definition were more qualified. I don’t see how anyone could argue the contrary unless they believed that there is some sort of raw luck in the admissions process. I don’t believe that. Subjectivity, sure. But pure, random luck of the draw? I don’t think anyone is drawing straws over in Cambridge.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I actually didn’t know him well. I just find it hard to believe that given that some factor made some people receive an acceptance letter and some not, it is legitimate to say that Eric or anyone else “took up a spot.” He (and they) earned it by gaining admission, while someone that was rejected has no further claim to that spot. This isn’t to say that they’re less intelligent or less poised for success. If it were up to me, I could think of plenty of people more deserving of my spot than me. But I guess my point is that, it’s a different story in Harvard’s eyes.</p>

<p>I don’t mean to sound like I don’t understand your position. I do. I’ve argued it in the past. I’m just not as confident in its tenability anymore. But you are certainly arguing your point well.</p>