Havard 2+2

Graduate School Business School - MBA
141

<p>
[quote]

No. Actually your failure was to presume that because I initially felt inclined, in good faith, to contact you, that I would feel the same after the <em>show</em> started. You see, and I am sure you'll understand this, I have neither an incentive nor the naive inclination to explain myself to a stranger, not even to you Sakky.</p>

<p>And much to my embarrassment, admittedly, I had no idea that PMs and email worked the same way on CC. Call me old school, or ignorant.</p>

<p>I hope this leaves things clear.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>It's hardly clear at all, especially now that I've cleared my PM box. Feel free to write whatever you wrote me before. Why not? You were willing to write me before, so why not now? </p>

<p>
[quote]
People can assume whatever they want. If that satisfies your reasoning (i.e. ignorant people making ignorant claims with lack of data), then more power to you.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Uh, somehow I don't think it's the other people that are being ignorant here. </p>

<p>
[quote]
Would it surprise you to know that I didn't frequent the library much?

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Yes, because you have to. I'll leave it up to you to figure out why every HBS student would have to use the library at least a few times. </p>

<p>
[quote]
The funny thing is that even a nerdy PhD applicant might know the answer to this after visiting. So why you are asking me for an answer that does not prove anything? Isn't that just silly? MIT is close enough to visit anytime, so any MIT student would easily find the answer.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Because I'm giving you a softball question! You are correct - it is a very basic question, and so answering it doesn't completely prove anything. But not answering it does reveal quite a bit. </p>

<p>But anyway, fine, have it your way. What kind of question would you prefer? </p>

<p>
[quote]
Now the really funny thing is that, as of now, despite your silly and incessant questioning, you have never explained your own connection to HBS. Did you cross-enrolled for a class while at MIT? Attended the extension school? Visited friends over at HBS? Come, Sakky, it's not fun to play a one-way game. Tell us.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>I don't think I have to, as nobody is questioning my background (except you). </p>

<p>But how's this. Why don't you ask me a question about HBS. </p>

<p>
[quote]
Bingo, Sakky! In case you did not notice, I already said I am fine with that. Yet you continued, apparently not getting it, positing silly comments such as: "why would you want that for yourself?" And, well, while I appreciate your maternal instinct for online strangers, that's my business, Sakky.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Uh, if you were truly "fine" with the situation, then why do you continue to feel the need to explain yourself? Somebody who is truly "fine" would have let the situation alone a long time ago. So, exactly who's not getting it? Bingo.</p>

142

<p>"Sakky, I CANNOT believe you're dignifying this girl with a response."</p>

<p>So, let me see… a homophobic McCain supporter (potentially racist too), wanna-be philosophy major, with a ~3.5 GPA from a community college who cannot decide what whether his “dream school” is UT-A or UF, and who believes his/her candidacy is a lost cause for USC, and who does not understand the difference between a university and a LAC or how membership status is granted on college confidential for that matter, well, he/she doesn’t think people should “dignify” my comments with their response. Yet he/she is apparently thinking about lying about his ECs on his desperate transfer application. Hmmm. Very impressive, dude, very impressive.
.
<a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/university-florida/581095-advice.html%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/university-florida/581095-advice.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p><a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-essays/596404-too-risky-talk-about-being-gay.html#post1061268900%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-essays/596404-too-risky-talk-about-being-gay.html#post1061268900&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p><a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/uc-transfers/595844-uc-question-helppp.html#post1061263711%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/uc-transfers/595844-uc-question-helppp.html#post1061263711&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p><a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/transfer-students/595555-different-question-time.html%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/transfer-students/595555-different-question-time.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p><a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-admissions/593851-very-hypothetical-yet-interesting-question.html#post1061244999%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-admissions/593851-very-hypothetical-yet-interesting-question.html#post1061244999&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

143

<p>Game over lol</p>

144

<p>dahahahahah at least I can be realistic with the schools i PLAN to attend--rather than lying on a FORUM. lol I am honestly dumbfounded.</p>

145

<p>FOR THE THIRD TIME, YOU ARE A PSEUDO-INTELLECTUAL AND PRETENTIOUS LOSER. </p>

<p>kill yourself.</p>

146

<p>"Uh, somehow I don't think it's the other people that are being ignorant here." </p>

<p>Well, like everyone else, ignorant or not, you are entitled to your opinion, Sakky. I don't think people are ignorant because of what they normally say; but it's very clear when they want to make assertions about someone they don't even know. </p>

<p>"Yes, because you have to. I'll leave it up to you to figure out why every HBS student would have to use the library at least a few times." </p>

<p>I said "much" not "never". You are reading what's not there, Sakky. I may very well know where the Stacks is. </p>

<p>"Because I'm giving you a softball question! You are correct - it is a very basic question, and so answering it doesn't completely prove anything. But not answering it does reveal quite a bit."</p>

<p>Let me see if I can explain this: I am not playing softball or hardball or any-ball with you. And, again, you are reading what's not there. Not answering only truly reveals that, well, I am not answering. Get it? The rest is up for you to speculate about. Again, I am flattered to occupy your thinking this much. It is also amusing.</p>

<p>"But anyway, fine, have it your way. What kind of question would you prefer?"</p>

<p>Allow me to propose you the next question: why are you so obsessed with asking me questions? </p>

<p>"I don't think I have to, as nobody is questioning my background (except you)."</p>

<p>Really? I'd like to think I would deserve an answer. :) -- but if my memory serves me well, it has been questioned before. There was never an answer either.</p>

<p>"But how's this. Why don't you ask me a question about HBS. "</p>

<p>What would that solve? Let's see, you potentially attended MIT and, so, you potentially cross-enrolled for a class or two at Harvard or had/have friends at HBS. So you potentially will have some decent insight into the school. </p>

<p>How about this: how about you tell me who the in at the Dillon house attended Trinity and in which admission board he/she sits. It should not be hard. That would, for the first time since my PM to you got rejected, compel me to send my answer back to you. </p>

<p>"Uh, if you were truly "fine" with the situation, then why do you continue to feel the need to explain yourself? Somebody who is truly "fine" would have let the situation alone a long time ago. So, exactly who's not getting it? Bingo."</p>

<p>In case you have not noticed, I am not explaining myself per se. I am primarily pointing out your flaws in reasoning/reading comprehension. Also, casually letting people know that I am around--not in hiding as they fantasize. It's kind of fun. </p>

<p>But you are right, I need to stop wasting my time with people like transferkid. I am almost embarrassed by association.</p>

147

<p>"at least I can be realistic with the schools i PLAN to attend--rather than lying on a FORUM." </p>

<p>Calling yourself a "lost case" is probably realistic; and yes you do it in one of your post. At least you tell the truth. </p>

<p>Now lying on a forum is probably better than lying on your transfer application:<a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-admissions/593851-very-hypothetical-yet-interesting-question.html#post1061244999%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/college-admissions/593851-very-hypothetical-yet-interesting-question.html#post1061244999&lt;/a> . Don't do it.</p>

<p>"dahahahahah at least I can be realistic with the schools i PLAN to attend--rather than lying on a FORUM. lol I am honestly dumbfounded."</p>

<p>Would it rather be: found dumb? After your hysterical laughter, I'd agree to that one.</p>

<p>FOR THE THIRD TIME, YOU ARE A PSEUDO-INTELLECTUAL AND PRETENTIOUS LOSER.
kill yourself."</p>

<p>For the first time: you are a nobody. Get it. Your opinion does not matter much. With that GPA you might not even get into a good transfer school. See, realistically, it might be over for you.</p>

<p>Achieve something first, then attempt to talk. As for "killing" myself, well you are clearly mature. Why don't you do it, Socrates?</p>

148

<p>As I said in that thread NOT ONE of the schools I applied to even afforded the opportunity to list EC's-- you criticize Sakky for 'reading what's not there' YET YOU JUST DID IT YOURSELF YOU MORON!!!!!!</p>

<p>Achieve something first? okay definitely. I will make a new account and build up a fake reputation for three years, until eventually my lies and inconsistencies surface. Apparently that constitutes achievement, right?!</p>

149

<p>"ou criticize Sakky for 'reading what's not there' YET YOU JUST DID IT YOURSELF YOU MORON!!!!!!"</p>

<p>:)</p>

<p>No, you see, after reading three different posts desperately asking about chances with a 3.5 from a community college, I knew all I had to. I took a cursory glance. I did not bother to read your posts. It would be a real waste of time. </p>

<p>You haven't left a community college and you still want to argue? Really?</p>

150

<p>
[quote]
I said "much" not "never". You are reading what's not there, Sakky. I may very well know where the Stacks is.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Uh, every HBS student has to know where the stacks are. I will leave it to you to determine why that is the case. </p>

<p>But anyway, are you saying that you've actually been to the library? Perhaps you could describe its general physical layout then? For example, as you walk in, what exactly do you see? </p>

<p>
[quote]
Let me see if I can explain this: I am not playing softball or hardball or any-ball with you. And, again, you are reading what's not there. Not answering only truly reveals that, well, I am not answering. Get it? The rest is up for you to speculate about. Again, I am flattered to occupy your thinking this much. It is also amusing.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>It is indeed amusing that you refuse to answer such a simple question.</p>

<p>
[quote]
How about this: how about you tell me who the in at the Dillon house attended Trinity and in which admission board he/she sits. It should not be hard. That would, for the first time since my PM to you got rejected, compel me to send my answer back to you.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Now that's a far more difficult question, as I think you know that I don't have an easy way to get access to resumes of staff members. {CV's/Resumes to students and faculty aren't that hard, but staff is another thing entirely.} </p>

<p>Nevertheless, I fail to see how this would deter you from PM'ing to me the same message that you tried before. </p>

<p>
[quote]
In case you have not noticed, I am not explaining myself per se. I am primarily pointing out your flaws in reasoning/reading comprehension. Also, casually letting people know that I am around--not in hiding as they fantasize. It's kind of fun.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>I think we are all pointing out flaws in your particular claimed background. I too am mystified as to how your time line works out.</p>

<p>In any case, why don't you provide us with a reason - any reason at all - to make us believe that you are connected to HBS as you so claim. By all means, enter the database and cite some facts from it. Or discuss exactly how, say, the dining room in Spangler Hall looks. Just give us something.</p>

151

<p>your life will never transcend online forums.</p>

152

<p>lol wildflower is an avatar--its all fantasy, the time-line doesn't have to make sense!</p>

153

<p>I never thought about that, transferkid21.</p>

154

<p>wildflower, my 3.5 gpa is hopeless, yet I got into CALS at Cornell. Weiirddddddd..</p>

<p>albeit it may have been due to an articulation with my CC, but hey, yet another one of your claims rendered USELESS.</p>

155

<p>"Now that's a far more difficult question, as I think you know that I don't have an easy way to get access to resumes of staff members. {CV's/Resumes to students and faculty aren't that hard, but staff is another thing entirely.}" </p>

<p>It is a good question. See, anyone can get access to CVs/Resumes if they try hard enough; heck for the most part faculty's are online for free, or you pay for student's if you are a recruiter. However, to know the answer to this you would need to be in the MBA social circle--that individual frequents MBA parties. Hint: Halloween party? But perhaps you are a PhD student, or just a recruiter. </p>

<p>How about this, Sakky: how many projectors are in a MBA classroom?</p>

<p>"Or discuss exactly how, say, the dining room in Spangler Hall looks. Just give us something."</p>

<p>HA! Sakky, I do like to eat. Hmmm...what part of it exactly? The furniture? Length? The study rooms in Spangler? (I've taken my sushi there, so it should count). How you can look down almost into the cafeteria while talking on your cell phone from any floor, coming back the study rooms?</p>

156

<p>"your life will never transcend online forums."</p>

<p>Wow, dude, you are deep. What do they call you, confucious? Aphorism and being confused match you well.</p>

<p>"wildflower, my 3.5 gpa is hopeless, yet I got into CALS at Cornell. Weiirddddddd.. albeit it may have been due to an articulation with my CC, but hey, yet another one of your claims rendered USELESS." </p>

<p>Of course you did. Let me remove any confusion you may have about this: CALS is not the real Cornell. It is NOT the College of Arts and Sciences. You are potentially screwed for philosophy; I hope you realize this. CALS is the state-funded attachment of Cornell. It is not considered the same as the college.</p>

157

<p>wow, she's back! You can keep on attacking us here, but this thread will never die, you're welcome.</p>

<p>
[quote]
Of course you did. Let me remove any confusion you may have about this: CALS is not the real Cornell. It is NOT the College of Arts and Sciences. You are potentially screwed for philosophy; I hope you realize this. CALS is the state-funded attachment of Cornell. It is not considered the same as the college.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Of course, coming from a Whitman College junior.</p>

158

<p>"You can keep on attacking us here"</p>

<p>Where did you see yourself being mentioned? Did you feel single out when I said "ignorant" or "dumb"? Get over yourself, you are not that important.</p>

159

<p>"Of course, coming from a Whitman College junior."</p>

<p>Three things my brilliant friend: </p>

<p>1) Two words: early graduation. If you stalk me long enough and intelligently enough, you'll see that I had 2 years of college under my belt before applying to Whitman.</p>

<p>2) Why do you assume I ended up at Whitman? Have you checked thoroughly to see if I went elsewhere? </p>

<p>Things like this make me understand why you would feel singled out, as mentioned above. </p>

<p>3) Most top LACs are much better than CALS, which is a state-funded school. You figure out why. Hint: state-funded. Hint: direct admission programs with community colleges. Etc.</p>

160

<p>this thread isn't going to die until one of two things happen. </p>

<ol>
<li>You declare yourself a fraud, as any logical person would conclude based on the given information. </li>
<li>You go away for a year. </li>
</ol>

<p>I will keep on bumping this thing until everybody on CC knows you're a fraud, or until we reach the page limit on CC.</p>