<p>Hello,
I am an international student who contemplated heavily on UCLA (business economics) vs UT McCombs (possibly finance) and chose UT. Now, I feel that I actually made an incorrect decision.
Personally, not being in the US, I made all my decisions from what I read on the internet.
My main qualms about going to UT are:
1. I didn't apply to BHP and now from what I gather is, if I am not in BHP, I am literally screwed as a finance major. I am not going to land an investment banking job and heck, I might not land a job anywhere (I need a work visa). On the other hand, UCLA grads(on online forums) tend to land fabulous jobs no matter what.
2. Economics > finance is the general consensus. Combine eco with a school like UCLA and it is potent.
I would like to double major in eco at UT too; the problem is I come in with zero credits as I am an international student. And from what other students have told me, a dual major isn't advisable.
3. UCLA trumps UT on national prestige. </p>
<p>What are your thoughts on these? Are these real worries or am I just getting cold feet.
Thank you for your replies :) </p>