Let me help you… “Maryland” is your answer. It’s not a reach for you. You are instate and have good scores. Maryland has a good engineering dept. Its cost effective. Of your “reach” schools only NW will offer you a different experience. The others are no different than Maryland. I don’t get WashU unless you are doing something medical. Also you aren’t getting into GaTech with a 1470 unless you are a refugee. Typical safeties are instate schools.
From your list NW and GaTech stick out as excellent different opportunities outside of Maryland. I would add UCSD to your target list.
Maybe, if I blurt out my experience with this it will help you formulate what you should look for and consider.
I often see this question…
Which school should I choose for undergraduate Engineering or CS?
…and some combination of MIT, Stanford, CMU, GaTech, California, Michigan, Illinois, Texas, (other State Schools) …
I went through this with my kids. I’ve/we’ve researched all these schools, and visited/toured all except Michigan.
Research Observations
- There is negligible difference in the quality of the Engineering departments of these schools. They teach the same things and all have excellent faculty and research facilities. You aren’t going to learn anything magical at one verses the others.
1.5) Undergraduate research opportunities are best/easiest at Stanford and MIT.
-
There no difference in the intelligence of the enrolled students in these Engineering/CS programs. I’ve listed the schools above by SAT scores. The difference in the scores is a function of the size of the school. If you strip the schools down to the size of MIT (4500 students) you’ll find: GaTech, MIT, Michigan, Stanford, California, Illinois, Texas, CMU is the order of SAT scores and the scores are very close.
-
You will not make more money attending Stanford over these others. The difference in salaries is solely a function of the region the school. The Stanford grad and the Texas grad will make the same at company X.
3.5) Internships are easier to get at Stanford, MIT, CMU… GaTech, Texas, California … Michigan, Illinois
- Prestige. I’ve worked in engineering/research and hiring of engineers for years. Prestige is regional. Of these schools only MIT and Stanford elicit a, “Wow you went to X.” The others are, “That’s a good school.” after that you have to interview. It doesn’t land the job. If a Michigan and a Texas graduate are looking for a job in Texas, all things being the same, the Texas guy has the advantage. A Berkeley degree carries as much weight as a GaTech degree.
4.5) Rankings… these are just splitting hairs. These schools are top ten in almost every ranking. You can’t go wrong.
-
Except for MIT, all have nice campuses. MIT campus is a little sad. Texas is nice but a little overwhelming… jam packed with buildings. Berkeley is over populated. Stanford has the best campus… it’s not even close. Once you get past the exterior of the buildings at Stanford they are typically a little run down from use like all other campuses.
-
Except for GaTech, all have female populations above 42%. Like MIT the females at GaTech are studying STEM which means they are smart.
-
Bad weather schools - Michigan, Illinois, MIT, CMU are miserable in winter. Berkeley is chilly always. GaTech is muggy in summer. Texas is scorching in summer. Texas has the best all year round weather.
-
School size undergraduate (k), graduate (k)
Texas, Illinois, Michigan, California - 30+, 10 large
GaTech - 15, 10 medium
Stanford, CMU - 7, 7+ nice
MIT - 5, 7 small
-
Student regional diversity (descending order): Stanford, MIT, CMU GaTech, Michigan, Illinois, California, Texas
-
Cost-wise and Return-On-Investment: GaTech, MIT, Stanford, CMU, Texas, Illinois, California Michigan. I’ve looked at many ROIs for colleges this is more or less the average of what I’ve seen.
University Personality
Stanford - medium stress, medium STEM, A students, easy A’s, easy to get classes, easy to change majors, best campus, lots of options, good school spirit
MIT, CMU, GaTech - high stress, high STEM, A students, hard A’s, fairly easy to get classes, easy to change majors, lack of options, good school spirit
California, Michigan, Illinois, Texas - medium stress, medium-low STEM, large university, A to B- students, hard A’s engineering, harder to get classes, hard to change majors, lots of options, high school spirit, typical of all large state univerities.
What conclusions were reached?
-
If you live in Texas, Michigan, Illinois, California there is NO reason to leave the state to attend Texas, Michigan, Illinois, California as an OOS student. These schools are the same. It would be unwise to spend the cost of OOS. Unless you are a big fan or have a scholarship.
-
If you live in Texas, Michigan, Illinois, California there ARE reasons to attend Stanford, MIT, CMU, GaTech over your state school. These schools offer a different experience and are smaller, intense universities. You’ll be surrounded by smart people.
-
If you live outside of Texas, Michigan, Illinois, California there are limited reasons (cost, scholarship) to attend these schools if you were also admitted to Stanford, MIT, CMU, GaTech.
-
Our final ranking considering academics, environment, ROI, location, opportunity of the schools NOT considering cost:
Stanford, GaTech, CMU, MIT, no particular order California, Michigan, Illinois, Texas
-
Our final ranking also considering cost:
GaTech, Stanford, MIT, Texas, Illinois, CMU, California, Michigan
I will extend my comments to include Purdue, Texas A&M, UCSD, UCLA, Maryland, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Washington, UVA, NC State, to the list of large public universities. These schools fall just a little lower in the engineering rankings. But there is no real benefit for an Indiana resident to forgo engineering at Purdue for Texas or Berkeley unless you have a scholarship.
Also, I would throw Duke, NW and Rice in with my Stanford comments.