<p>I took the ACT in June. I did fairly well overall (35 composite score), but I completely bombed the essay part (I got a 6 :P). My question was whether or not teachers should be allowed to set their own rules in their classrooms. I said yes, they should be able to, and wrote a 1.5 essay supporting that. I said that every class has different requirements and thus should have different rules, that the teachers are the ones working the closest with the students so they would understand each classes' dynamics and what rules would work best for that class, and that the superintendent might not have the clearest view of what the rules should be. I refuted the argument against allowing the teachers to set their own rules (that it might be confusing) by saying that it will just be slightly confusing and that this confusion will just help to prepare them more for college, where they will have keep track of every aspect of their lives. And after 1.5 pages of this I wrapped it up with a summery and left thinking that wasn't that bad, only to be floored with a SIX!! THAT SUCKS!!! What did I do wrong? </p>
<p>The comments were "Your essay responded to the prompt by taking a clear position on the issue. Your essay used some specific details, reasons, and examples, but it needed more of them." </p>
<p>I didn't use specific examples, because the only specific examples I could think of would be personal ones and they wouldn't really have any credibility.</p>
<p>Any help here? And I know a 6 is bad, but how bad is it?</p>