Help with deciding upon rush-scoring or not

<p>Hey,
I have finished applying to 11 universities and have sent them my SAT I scores already. However, I am only going to be able to give my SAT II exams in January, and am thus quite worried about the time that it will take these scores to reach my universities. Thus, i would like any input as to whether i should rush my SAT scores to these universities( they all receive scores electronically btw)</p>

<p>Princeton
Amherst
Upenn
Northwestern
Duke
Dartmouth
Middlebury
Brandeis
Oberlin
Carleton
Grinnell</p>

<p>P.S---If i do choose the rush option, does it mean that all my universities will receive rushed reports? And for which of my universities do you guys think rushing will actually delay the scores??</p>

<p>Assuming they all take Jan scores, then the fastest form of delivery is for you to name them in your test application as schools to automatically receive scores upon release of scores. You can name four for no charge and then can name additional ones for $10.50 per college. That assures the scores will get to the college in time to be considered. Rush delivery, which you cannot do until after score comes out, is actually slower and does not assure scores will get there in time.</p>

<p>I know some schools say that rush delivery is not that much faster than regular delivery (I can’t remember which ones, but a few actually recommend regular over rush, saying it’s not worth the extra cost), so I’d do what drusba said and list them during registration.</p>

<p>So you guys all agree normal score reports would be best?</p>

<p>I would agree with the others. When adcoms have discussed the issue, like during presentations, I have never heard any of them say that scores should be rushed. Instead, they always say to send them not rushed.</p>