<p>The reason I suggest to avoid the service companies is for the fact that there work hours and work environment for field engineers are pretty horrible. They don’t seem to treat there personnel all that well. I interviewed with Halliburton and I didn’t get a good impression. I was turned off by it. I also seen a presentation from Baker and I wasn’t motivated to apply. </p>
<p>My experience may be different but to each their own. I don’t know what you are trying to say with the training reference. If you want to be a production engineer you can’t necessarily do that with a service company. You also can’t run a well site at a service company. They do offer a more technically oriented focus, however that was not a priority for me. You can learn drilling services but you won’t be operating the well or calling the shots. In my opinion joining a service company is like playing the bass guitar in a band. The lead guitarist gets all the attention. </p>
<p>What you stated about the largely integrated service companies is true. Anadarko, EOG, and others have been making some very nice discoveries. I think that has more to do with their approach and company culture than anything else. However, you can’t even compare an Anadarko or EOG to a service company like Halliburton, etc.</p>
<p>My general impression of everyone I’ve ever met that worked for a service company was they hated their job. That goes for engineers all the way to entry level operators. Also, the majority of people who work for a service company tend to want to work for an operator eventually. I also never heard the words from my classmates when I was in college that their first choice was a service company. Usually they took it if it was their only option. That is my experience, I don’t know about yours.</p>