<p>Just starting the "interested observer" process...my DS is finishing UG (at a "lower" Ivy) and has just taken the LSAT...he has a very high GPA (3.9+), but a rather disappointing first LSAT score: 165.</p>
<p>He plans to retake the LSAT.</p>
<p>Would love to hear your perspective(s) on the potential outcomes...he feels confident he can do better on his second attempt at the LSAT (that was his pattern w/standardized tests in high school, too...he improved his SAT by 70 points on his second attempt)...</p>
<p>He tells me that most of the N-14 law schools no longer look at more than one LSAT score; they just look at the one the applicant submits. Is this your experience, too?</p>
<p>He has not finalized his list of schools he'd like to attend...but is inclined towards the big city schools (NY, Chicago, Washington, DC) in the "national 14"...he definitely wants an N-14 school. He has not settled on a particular area of the law in which he's interested...he believes his law school experience will help him determine that)...it seems to him (and to me, with much less current knowledge) that he has a realistic shot at acceptance at one or more of these schools, particularly if he improves his LSAT score.)</p>
<p>He does want to go to law school full time, and to start in the fall of 2009.</p>
<p>Both his father and I are lawyers w/JDs from an N-14 school, but both of us took LSATs and attended law school so long ago that I'm inclined to believe that our (very different) experiences are basically irrelevant.</p>
<p>So...what do you think DS will need to achieve on his second LSAT to have a realistic shot at the NY, Chicago and Washington, DC N-14 schools? (Reminder: his GPA is in excess of 3.9). And what kind of schools can he aspire to if he keeps his 165 score from his first attempt?</p>
<p>Thanks for the input...as is usual, he's calmer and more knowledgeable than I am...I believe everything he's telling me...but I found the CC input when we were going thru the UG application process very helpful at staving off my tendency to "bug him" w/questions and comments...and presume I will find it equally useful this go-round!</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>