<p>I am angry. My son, who has 2200+ SAT scores and mid-700s on 2 subject tests and a relatively low GPA (3.6) with a tough load of classes at a well-known upscale community public high school, has been deferred from the college of his choice. It is well known among the students at his high school that for many courses, your grade depends more on luck of the draw with teachers than on your accomplishments.
For example, in AP English Language and Composition, one teacher gave only 2, maybe 3 students As first semester and only a few more As second semester (out of a class of about 35 students). He also gave a few Cs first semester, but these students dropped to regular English classes second semester. (A few students, knowing they did not have a prayer of getting As and might even wind up with Cs, dropped to regular English classes at the very beginning of the year.) At least one other teacher with multiple sections of the course awarded over 50% As (some say 75% As). Except for the very top students, all of whom are bound for HPY, Stanford, or MIT (or, possibly, Williams or Amherst), the grade a student receives in AP English Language and Composition at my son's school depends more on the teacher than on student ability. The same was true in 10th grade English as well as in some courses in other departments, but to a lesser extent.
I spoke to the principal about this problem when my son was in 11th grade. He did not deny that a problem exists, but he told me that colleges look at grades holistically, and my son's excellent standardized test scores will show the colleges that he is a good student.
Now that we are in the middle of the college application process, and my son has received a deferral from the college of his choice, I am absolutely livid. I do not get the sense that colleges, concerned about US News and World Report rankings, truly look holistically at applications. A representative from the school my son wants to attend visited his high school a few months ago and bluntly said that the school wants to see GPAs of 3.8. Students at my son's high school earn national awards in academic-related extracurricular activities such as speech and debate and publications and my son is one of them. (I don't want to name his specific activity.)
My impression is that colleges look first at high school GPA and then they consider whether SAT scores. Without the magic number for the GPA, students are rarely considered. For Ivies, upper middle class students at public high schools are expected to have national standing in some activity, but national ranking in some sort of academic extra-curricular activity and high standardized test scores do not compensate for a slightly low GPA at prestigious LACs.
For the record, I support efforts to enroll veterans of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. I believe that first generation college students should not be held to the same standard as my son. However, I am adamantly opposed to the efforts of elite colleges to seek out foreign students and, in many cases, award them scarce financial aid dollars when so many qualified Americans are not being admitted and are struggling to pay exorbitant fees. </p>
<p>I understand that the SATs are culturally biased, but when you judge students from similar backgrounds, I find that they mean a whole lot more than GPAs. You cannot even necessarily compare the GPAs of two students from the same high school.</p>