history or bio?

<p>I've got a question. I'm currently taking ap bio, and will be done by december. If I take SATII Bio in december will I be okay? Plus just to mention, I'm doing horribly in ap bio right now so i might be taking u.s. history instead. Problem is although I did really well in all my history classes, I haven't taking us history since 11th grade(im a senior). So I guess my second question would be should i take the bio or the history. Sorry if this question is kinda confusing</p>

<p>Take a bio practice test (preferrably Kaplan because its been proven to be the most realistic) and see if your AP bio class was just hard or if you really don't know your biology.</p>

<p>I second priceless 28. If I were in your position I would take the Bio SAT II as opposed to the USH. Good luck :)</p>

<p>our school's ap bio is notorious in our school for being tough. The highest grade in the class is an 85, and if it weren't for the curve, i'd be screwed too. But it does seem that bio might be better. Is the McGraw Hill book for SATII bio okay? Currently that's the one i have.</p>

<p>Get barrons if you can...</p>

<p>Yea, definitely buy barrons!</p>

<p>I pretty good at history, but i also haven't taken US history since junior year (now a senior) but I scored a 600 without studying. So I guess it's really up to you. I like history, so I don't really mind studying for it. It would be difficult to study something that you are already having trouble in.</p>