<p>
[quote]
Since the test is roughly the same every year, I think discussing last year's problems gives the readers of this forum an unfair advantage.
[/quote]
I agree. qwert271, please refrain in the future from posting specific problems. The same goes for everyone else.</p>
<p>
[quote]
By the way, I don't know what the Peason axioms are. Do you mean the Peano axioms?
[/quote]
Isn't that obvious? Oh well. Yes, I meant to type "Peano."</p>
<p>You've got to be insane to take honors analysis though...or really love math.</p>
<p>If you are going to place out of calc, you could very easily continue with a regular analysis path that wouldnt have homework tantamount to a full time job (for just one class) or if you dont have a strong background in proofs go for somewhere in the 160s sequence (even the experimental section whouldnt be the hell that is honors analysis).</p>
<p>I mean...you probobly <em>could</em> take it but...see where the placement test puts you and unless you are 100% positive, dont try to talk your way into a higher placement...I had a few friends who did this and went up to the 160s but it was too much (one was too much difficulty, the other was mostly that it took too much time) so they dropped after first quarter to 153.</p>
<p>Oh, and with regards to the placment test, I remember a sample test showing up here (either here or on the livejournal) last year before the test so I dont think its that big a deal to discuss whats on it. </p>
<p>I dont think there is any worry about having an unfair advantage since it is only placment. I wouldnt reccomend studying because they assume you havnt and if you look at a bunch of sample tests and rip out the books and study study study, you are going to place higher than you are capable of and you will just struggle, get bad grades, and end up having to drop down. It is in your best interest (no matter what you actually think) to get the score on the test that you will get when you just walk in there, sit down, and take it.</p>