<p>i'm hoping that they are more accurate than barron's because if the barron's is accurate than i basically got a 0 on the practice test!</p>
<p>if you're talking about pr's Math level 2 book, it's pretty good, I have to say, while being just a little bit harder than the actual test. I got 4-5 wrong out of 50 on the pr test and an 800 on the actual.</p>
<p>what about sparknote's tests?</p>
<p>How do Sparknotes, PR, Barron's, and Meylani compare to the actual test?</p>
<p>barrons and meylani are harder</p>
<p>PR equal..? i think
sparknotes fluctuate...very random</p>
<p>barrons and meylani are harder</p>
<p>PR equal..? i think
sparknotes fluctuate...very random</p>
<p>iono but barrons is hella hard, last time i took pr and barrons i got 750 and 630</p>
<p>yeah i got a 760 on PR</p>
<p>good?</p>
<p>so it's confirmed that PR = real test?</p>
<p>im pretty sure that it does</p>
<p>the only difference is that PR may have some awkwardly phrased q's whers the real one wont</p>
<p>example</p>
<p>number 16 math lvl 2 form B</p>
<p>You are totally right... Princeton Review Math II, #16, Form B is so weird. I took that last night and was like what kind of question is this...</p>
<p>yeah i had no idea what it ws even asking</p>
<p>thanks :) </p>
<p>i've given up reading Barron's. i have no idea how what they are asking half of the time...</p>
<p>official college board book equals real tests</p>
<p>other than that PR is closest</p>