<p>Hi =)
I know that they are real past tests, but are they accurate now even from way back in 2003 or 2005? Basically, has the test gotten more difficult since then (especially in science?)
How have your real scores compared to the ones you took from the pamphlets/booklets (idk what to call them) from like 2003-2004 or 2005-2006 or even 2009-2010?
Thanks!</p>
<p>The June ACT had excessive tricky math problems, the English questions were longer than usual, and the reading seemed to be a little bit difficult. Science was pretty normal, except conflicting scientists was replaced with three different hypothesis (which happens from time to time).
The Real ACT is the most accurate book of practice exams, and the sections I mentioned earlier were harder than usual. It is hard to find the answer keys for the older released ones. Good luck.</p>
<p>Hi =)
thanks for your response. One question- like for the june act, are they allowed to just make it that difficult? Or did the curve account for the added difficulty?</p>
<p>The curve should account for the added difficulty. I think how the curve works is that they want approximately the same number or percentage of test takers to score in a certain way – the typical bell curve. With so many people taking advanced math courses, they may have added difficulty to insure that this would happen.</p>