<p>how bad do you think your calc and analytical geom course is? I'd say stay with whatever your actual gpa would be including the calc course because (1) grad schools will see a WF as at most a C and (2) the difference between a 3.9 and a 3.85 is probably not going to make or break an acceptance.</p>
<p>If you've failed a couple of classes, is that a deathblow to your chances? What if the course is completely irrelevant to the field of study one intends to pursue?</p>
<p>Its not the end of the world, provided you re-take and do well. That said, you might want to ask yourself why, as someone planning graduate study in a science, you did poorly in what is a pretty basic math class. </p>
<p>As Werd says, a .05 difference in GPA won't make the slightest difference in your chances. Much more important to grad school applications will be research, LORs and SOP.</p>
<p>Check out the posts of molliebatmit for the real, current, truth about whats going on in the hard sciences admissions.</p>
<p>As a general rule, from talking to Admission depts in the past, anything above a C is almost always better than a W or WF -- EVEN if you retake the course!</p>
<p>Think about it from the view of an admissions selection committee. What would you assume was the student's grade when s/he decided to withdraw midsemester? A D... an F? Yeah... they're thinking the same thing!</p>