<p>We always hear statistics about how "Yale only accepts 50% (or whatever) of 1600s." I'd like to see how the CC 1600s did. Add to the numbers below:</p>
<p>Accepted: 0
Waitlisted: 0
Rejected: 1</p>
<p>I'm in (though was deferred EA)...</p>
<p>Accepted: 1
Waitlisted: 0
Rejected: 1</p>
<p>Accepted:2
Waitlisted:0
Rejected: 1</p>
<p>(rejected from harvard tho - but are we sad about that? bulldooog bulldoggggg....no!)</p>
<p>Beautiful. Of my top three choices, rejected, rejected, waitlisted.</p>
<p>Accepted: 2
Waitlisted: 1
Rejected: 1</p>
<p>I feel your pain toasterking... rejected, rejected, waitlisted (yale)</p>
<p>i got in RD</p>
<p>I was rejected :( :( :( :(</p>
<p>so the totals stand at 3, 3, 3 then? (i was waitlisted)</p>
<p>got in......</p>
<p>(someone - now, with rrod323 - it is.)</p>
<p>I was rejected at Yale and accepted at Harvard.</p>
<p>So
Accepted: 4
Waitlisted: 3
Rejected: 4</p>
<p>? </p>
<p>lol, I didn't get a 1600.. but I'm curious to see how this 50% 1600 rejection pans out...looking accurate.</p>
<p>Accepted: 5
Waitlisted: 3
Rejected: 4</p>
<p>accepted to 1 other ivy league and wait-listed at 2 others as well!</p>
<p>which ones?</p>
<p>I got in!!! waitlisted at Harvard though
Accepted: 6
Waitlisted: 3
Rejected: 4</p>
<p>A 1600 isn't everything. It will only make you look competitive. Once you have your SAT score, it's the rest that gets you in.</p>
<p>No one said differently, Diabolic. I'm just curious in seeing how 1600s actually do in admissions. The fact that we have 6 accepted and 7 not accepted proves your point.</p>
<p>Accepted: 6
Waitlisted: 4
Rejected: 4</p>
<p>I feel like such a figure...</p>
<p>SAT doesn't matter at all.</p>
<p>Well, maybe a little.</p>