How do colleges reject a "perfect" applicant?

<p>The admissions committee reviews a file:</p>

<p>--Valedictorian
--4.0 GPA
--2400 SAT
--Amazing ECs, leadership positions, national awards, etc.
--Glowing recommendations
--Perhaps even a legacy or URM</p>

<p>The verdict: Rejected!</p>

<p>Seriously, on what grounds do kids like this get rejected? What reasons do adcoms use to decide this kid is not good enough to be admitted?</p>

<p>Does it all come down to the essays?? Poor writing skills? A lackluster or cliche response? Does the kid come off as arrogant, immature or insecure? I just can't imagine anything else that would give adcoms a reason to reject these students.</p>

<p>Well they certainly must have their reasons. “Perfect” students get rejected all the time at colleges and universities where admissions decisions are not based strictly on GPA and test scores.</p>

<p>The short answer is, becuase there are also oh, fifty or other perfect students behind them, and they justify it because a class full of perfect people would be boring. When schools are assembling classes, they’re trying to create exactly that, a class of varied people, not a group of people who are all ‘perfect.’ Our high schools aren’t filled with all ‘perfect’ students, but rather, a mix of a whole bunch of different students. That’s how there can be a choir and a French club and a sports program and Whiz Quiz, and that’s how colleges can offer all kinds of excellent ECs and clubs-- because they recruit students trying to create a diverse community, not perfect students.</p>

<p>Seriously though, I’ve stopped trying to play the college admission game, because like I try explaining to adults who thought I had a ‘lock’ on an Ivy that I was deferred from, like others on this forum say, this game is a crapshoot. It’s like winning the lottery and being struck by lightening on the same day.</p>

<p>I tried my best. My college application reflects, to the best of my ability, who I am. I had people read over my essays, but I ignored advice to cut certain things out, because my essays reflect the voice with which I write. My parents are fretting because nobody ‘packaged’ it for me. But you know what? My essays and my application? It’s all me. I enjoyed high school. I learned things. I didn’t do ECs because I was thinking of my college app or volunteer because I was counting hours. I did things that mattered to me. I chased things that I cared about. And I wrote essays that reflected who I am and where I’ve come in the last two years and I tried to explain how I’ve grown and matured and become more of an adult and student. If that’s not what schools are looking for, than that’s fine-- I’m perfectly okay with that, because my applications represent me, and if a school wants something else, more power to them. I had a beautiful file, but then again, a whole bunch of other applicants did too. I had the scores and the grades and the awards, and maybe this time, that wasn’t good enough. Okay, maybe next time. Maybe somewhere else. Because the reality of the real word is, not just in college, but in grad school and jobs, a whole bunch of people are perfect now, not just you. Sometimes, sadly, it is just about luck.</p>

<p>College rejections/deferrals aren’t personal-- they can’t be, because there are too many applicants. There is no perfect formula that gets even a ‘perfect’ applicant in every time, and trying to predict what magical combination of things will get you in is, in my opinion, useless and futile. Guessing what adcoms will get is useless, and quite frankly, I don’t want to play the game of ‘what if I had done x or y or z instead of a, b, and c?’ I’m going to take the time to enjoy senior year instead at a school I love.</p>

<p>(My laissez-faire attitude is also partly because I have been lucky enough to have a confirmed full-ride merit at a school I love with beautiful programs, because I sought out a safety school for just this reason. April 1 is now just icing on the cake.)</p>

<p>If the student is you, I would say apply to a couple more schools you love, maybe some with not the name-recognition you really want, and then let it go. You’re not going to be able to win an international award or add on three more AP classes between now and the deadline, so just…let it go. At the very least, if you were going to stress about what goes into your application, that time has passed, and nothing’s going to drastically change.</p>

<p>Think of it as a game of “Musical chairs”. There is one chair and 35 students. 20 of the students are just like the perfect student you describe, most of the others are close behind in qualifications and 5 have B or below averages. Eliminate the 5 and the rest are competing for the one chair, which means **many **perfect and near perfect students get denied.
If you look at the number of applications the top schools get for a limited number of freshman spots, it is easy to see how perfect students get rejected. Over 34,000 applicants at Harvard for 2,000 acceptance.
<a href=“https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0ArlRBr9Qvz0mdEdLNzNsRnBKT3Z1dDZ5QTFCQVV1NkE&output=html[/url]”>2012 Admission Decisions - Google Drive;

<p>It is a simple matter of supply and demand at the top schools.
But it certainly is a disappointment to all those students who worked so hard. We saw a few of those “denied” letters too :frowning:
That is why true match and safety schools are so important.</p>

<p>I definitely understand that there are far more qualified applicants than top colleges have room for. And that unfortunately, some have to be rejected. And I also understand that they want to create well rounded classes. I’m just curious about exactly HOW they pick “perfect student A” over an almost identical “perfect student B.” I’ve heard the example of, “Well, this kid is an oboe player and we’ve already admitted two oboe players.” Do they actually keep like a spreadsheet? “We’re up two violinists, reject the next one!”</p>

<p>I think there really is a huge amount of luck that goes along with it. It might be that one’s app/essay really clicks with one reader and they’re a huge advocate for that student when the app comes up to committee. Or the essay/the rec/the file, for some reason, just rubs a reader the wrong way. Or they’re skimming things and and they miss the really important thing you have or don’t really understand/register it.</p>

<p>I haven’t seen anyone with that profile get rejected on any of the results threads I’ve looked through, can you link me to one? From what I’ve seen many “perfect” applicants are confident of their chances and do get accepted. They also don’t need to visit CC; they know they are very qualified. See the daughter of that tiger mom lady, she only applied to Harvard Yale and UVA. Got into all of them. </p>

<p>I think the question you’re asking is “How do colleges reject qualified applicants?” which is a much simpler question. There are too many of them.</p>

<p>It is simply a myth that there are many “perfect applicants” out there, such as those described by OP with perfect GPAs/scores/ECs/awards/LORs, or many of them are routinely rejected by elite college adcoms. </p>

<p>Yes, we have all heard of the “horror stories”. But how many of them are truly “perfect applicants”? Most of them have shortcoming in some aspects if you examine their packages carefully.</p>

<p>A “perfect” or near-perfect candidate may well get rejected by a given high-end school, but very few candidates with stats as excellent as those described above would get rejected by ALL the high-end schools.</p>

<p>Assuming s/he had taken rigorous courses including science, and also assuming his/her essays don’t totally stink the place up, if the applicant above (in addition to safeties and matches) applied to say Harvard, Yale, Princeton, Stanford, MIT, Caltech, Columbia, and Chicago, I bet s/he would get admitted to at least three of the schools listed and maybe more. I can’t tell you which three, but I seriously doubt that a student that sparkling would strike out across the board.</p>