<p>for the practice tests for the BB and the PR tests?</p>
<p>I always took either the raw score or the median of the score ranges.</p>
<p>[sat_jan_curve.bmp</a> (image)](<a href=“sat_jan_curve.bmp]sat_jan_curve.bmp (image)”>sat_jan_curve.bmp (image)) </p>
<p>that is what i got from Ashraf Eassa</p>
<p>Which btw is a generous curve.</p>
<p>is it used for the blue book?</p>
<p>and how come theres no 670?</p>
<p>Hmm, the curve may be a fair bit too generous for the math. I simply took a curve from a practice test I’d recently done and posted it in my blog to help people determine their scores. </p>
<p>Perhaps I should have picked a less generous curve?</p>
<p>yo no se…</p>
<p>yes a less generous curve. lol</p>
<p>If you want a REALLY generous CR curve look no further than the Jan 2007 test.
I did the CR sections of it yesterday and they were RIDICULOUS. I’ve never missed so many SC questions before haha (-4), which still gave me a 760.</p>
<p>i think that is the Jan curve in the link i posted… -4 = 760 right there.</p>
<p>In December, -5 CR was 760…</p>
<p>Anyway, uh, in my blog I posted a new curve that’s much more accurate:</p>
<p>[maycurve.bmp</a> (image)](<a href=“maycurve.bmp]maycurve.bmp (image)”>maycurve.bmp (image))</p>
<p>No KeepRolling, the curve I’m talking about was 750 for -6, and 760 for -5</p>