<p>Oh, found more about the estimated relationship. It’s a direct formula:
"The SAT CR+M+W total score can be related to the ACT Composite using the following equation:</p>
<p>Estimated SAT CR+M score = (SAT CR+M+W score +15) / 1.5</p>
<p>Round this value to the nearest 10, and then use the concordance table to get the estimated ACT Composite score.</p>
<p>The ACT Composite can be related to the SAT CR+M+W scale by first converting the ACT Composite score to the SAT CR+M scale using the concordance table, and then using the following equation:</p>
<p>Estimated SAT CR+M+W score = (1.5 x SAT CR+M score) – 15</p>
<p>This number is rounded to the nearest 10." (from [ACT-SAT</a> Concordance: Understanding Estimated Relationship](<a href=“http://www.act.org/aap/concordance/estimating.html]ACT-SAT”>http://www.act.org/aap/concordance/estimating.html))</p>
<p>Does Brown use something like the formula or something like the percentile concordance to compare an ACT student applicant with an SAT student applicant?</p>