<p>What did you score on the PR tests compared to the real thing? Is it harder, easier, accurate, not accurate?</p>
<p>I haven’t taken the biology SAT II yet, but Princeton Review books are usually about the same for every test. They usually have a bit harder questions that the real test. And, there grading scale is the pretty similar (if not the same) as the test. So, I would say that your score will improve by a little on the real one.</p>
<p>Me personally, </p>
<p>I scored 600 range on PR and Sparknotes practice test and got a 750 on the real thing. </p>
<p>Honestly when it comes to Bio, its pretty much how lucky you get in getting an easy exam or a more difficult one.</p>
<p>just plain inaccurate.</p>
<p>So what is your recommendation meadow?</p>
<p>PR/Sparknotes aren’t bad for practice tests.</p>
<p>How good is the official practice test?
I got a 730 on it…</p>
<p>I think your actual score will be higher than PR’s… it was like that for me anyways
PR=730
actual=790</p>
<p>^<_<, well I used the Official SAT book, not PR…</p>
<p>@ shiomi: The official SAT book test is a recently administered one. So your score will likely fall within the range: 700-760.</p>
<p>ZorroX99: that’s good to hear, cuz I’ve been getting 600s on SN practice tests. But I agree it’s all about luck, I mean at the beginning of the test if I’m matched up with something I dunno I’m basically screwed lol (the part where you’re given ABCDE and you gotta choose one of them for the following so and so questions)</p>
<p>Is it just me or are the SN tests ■■■■■■■■?..
So many errors</p>
<p>^yup. They are…lol. That’s why I never trust them…they’re way too easy and have way too many errors.</p>
<p>For me PR=680, the real thing=780. XD</p>
<p>Meh…I only spent a couple days reviewing…
Here are my test scores…
PR - 650, 650
Official Blue Book - 730</p>
<p>Am I screwed?..
I took AP bio but that was last year.</p>
<p>PR-680
Blue Book-800
Real-800</p>