<p>My D is applying to Columbia and I wondered how important is an interview? Are you supposed to call and arrange it, or do they call you if they like your application?
Mbe</p>
<p>You're not supposed to call them about it, they'll call you. And I believe it's only an alumni interview unless you're legacy.</p>
<p>Your academic record is #1. Everything else is secondary. The interview is one of a number of factors -- along with letters, essays, ECs -- that they look at to decide who you are and why you want to go to Columbia and whether you'd be a good fit at Columbia.</p>
<p>You will get a call from an alumni interviewer. There is nothing for your kid to do. If she doesn't get called for an interview (about 1/3 of the applicants), it means nothing. Lots of kids won't get interviewed in areas where there aren't too many alums, or in areas where hundreds of kids apply.</p>
<p>an alum I met told me that as soon as you submit your application, your name goes on a list which they choose from to arrange interviews</p>
<p>That's correct. Choose isn't based grades or anything else. It is based on matching up an interviewer and student who live near each other.</p>
<p>"You're not supposed to call them about it, they'll call you. And I believe it's only an alumni interview unless you're legacy."</p>
<p>Can you please explain this? I would be a legacy when or if I apply. And correct me if I'm incorrect, but doesn't a legacy mean that one of your parents went to Columbia(my father)? I'm sort of confused on how the term is used.</p>
<p>Also, are you saying that in areas where there aren't as many applicants, you have a more likely chance of being interviewed? For example, would an applicant from Montana have more of a chance of being interviewed than that of an applicant from California?</p>
<p>If one of your parents went to CC/SEAS, you get an interview with the admissions office. That what you want to know?</p>
<p>You mean that if my father went to Columbia(which he did), I am obligated to go to an interview with my father(or someone else)? Why is that? Is it that they give preference to legacy's but must interview to assure that they don't give too much preference for an underqualified applicant that is a legacy? But why would they so boldly reveal their preference to legacy's? And what is an interview supposed to determine anyway? And who conducts the interview?</p>
<p>"You only get an on-campus interview with an adcom if your parent went to CC or SEAS. If your parents attended other Columbia schools, you can't interview on campus." </p>
<p>Being able to interview and requiring an interview are two different things. And is it that they trust Columbia alumni to not go to the school for an interview and blow it up or something? Who is an adcom?</p>
<p>No no, if you want, you can come to NY (from wherever you are) and interview with an admissions officer. This process is mainly a courtesy to keep good terms with the alumni. Why is this so difficult to grasp?</p>
<p>There are just so many aspects to the interview. It isn't hard to grasp, I just wanted to know all of the different aspects. For example, this thread is titled, "how important is interview". Now how would one know what type of interview you have? Who are you interviewing with? Are they evaluating you and your characteristics based on a judgment process during the interview? What, they rate your personality from one to ten? How would one seriously have the authority to interview in such a subjective way? Is the interview for you to learn more about the college or the college to learn more about you?
I understand now that if you are a legacy then you go to the campus and interview with an admissions officer. If you are a regular guy then you interview with someone like my dad(an alumni in the state). </p>
<p>As for the alumni aspect of it all...well that sounds totally different. Like they want to show you around the college because they want alumni to keep donating, as if they aren't even interested in the student. Also, why are you so contentious with me? As you can see, I don't know much about the admissions process, so why must you continue asking questions and making rude statements(i.e. Is this so hard to grasp, if you don't have A's, you should be "worried", of course you must have predominately A's.) You seem to know a lot about Columbia, so I don't want to get on your badside or whatever. Maybe you think I should just leave and come back when I am a junior or senior in high school(which is probably true/a good idea, but it would still be nice to be informed ahead of time).</p>
<p>You mean that if my father went to Columbia(which he did), I am obligated to go to an interview with my father(or someone else)?</p>
<br>
<blockquote> <p>No, you don't get interviewed by your father. You get interviewed by an admissions officer.</p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>Is it that they give preference to legacy's but must interview to assure that they don't give too much preference for an underqualified applicant that is a legacy?</p>
<br>
<blockquote> <p>Not sure what you're asking. The interviewer writes a report, so the admissions people know whether you had a good interview or a bad interview.</p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>Who are you interviewing with?</p>
<br>
<blockquote> <p>An alumnus/a of Columbia. If you're a legacy, you have the option of interviewing with an admissions officer.</p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>Are they evaluating you and your characteristics based on a judgment process during the interview?</p>
<br>
<p>What, they rate your personality from one to ten?</p>
<br> [QUOTE=""]
<blockquote> <p>Essentially. It isn't just your personality. It is your intelligence, curiousity, maturity, etc.</p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>How would one seriously have the authority to interview in such a subjective way?</p>
<br>
<blockquote> <p>Both. It is a two-way street. Except interviewers don't have to "sell" Columbia for ED, per se.</p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>As for the alumni aspect of it all...well that sounds totally different. </p>
<br>
<blockquote> <p>It is essentially the same thing. You sit down with another person and have a discussion with him/her, and he/she evaluates you.</p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>Like they want to show you around the college because they want alumni to keep donating, as if they aren't even interested in the student.</p>
<br>
<p>Also, why are you so contentious with me?</p>
<br> [QUOTE=""]
<blockquote> <p>I'm not.</p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>As you can see, I don't know much about the admissions process, so why must you continue asking questions and making rude statements(i.e. Is this so hard to grasp, if you don't have A's, you should be "worried", of course you must have predominately A's.)</p>
<br>
<blockquote> <p>The fact that you need mostly A's is a true statement, like it or not.</p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>(Well that was an obnoxious and unnecessary reply. Im just kidding. Thanks.) </p>
<br>
<blockquote> <p>No, you don't get interviewed by your father. You get interviewed by an admissions officer. </p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>(Yes, I understand that if you are a legacy then you are allowed to go to the college and interview with an admissions officer. If you arent a legacy then you interview with an alumni in your state. That is only if you are in the 1/3 picked.) </p>
<p>And is it that they trust Columbia alumni to not go to the school for an interview and blow it up or something?</p>
<p>(I mean that they arent allowing other applicants to go to the campus and interview with an admissions officer. Are they doing that because they cant really trust a random applicant to come to the campus, but they trust an alumnus? It is a stupid comment by me, but whatever.) </p>
<p>How would one seriously have the authority to interview in such a subjective way?</p>
<br>
<p>(Yes, but to me, this seems like the most subjective of all of the process. And the get used to it was harsh.) </p>
<p>Like they want to show you around the college because they want alumni to keep donating, as if they aren't even interested in the student.</p>
<br> [QUOTE=""]
<blockquote> <p>They are interested in the students. Legacies are more likely to get in. It isn't as if they're interviewing people who will be automatically rejected.</p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>(Oh, I see No matter what, if youre a legacy, youll either be accepted or deferred and then rejected. And legacy's are liked.) </p>
<br>
<blockquote> <p>The fact that you need mostly A's is a true statement, like it or not.</p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>(No, I understand that. The like it or not was unnecessary too. Still kidding. Thank you for the answers, although I knew most of them, some I was hazy about.)</p>
<p>(Yes, I understand that if you are a legacy then you are allowed to go to the college and interview with an admissions officer. If you arent a legacy then you interview with an alumni in your state. That is only if you are in the 1/3 picked.) </p>
<br>
<blockquote> <p>If you aren't a legacy, you aren't "picked." It is just a function of how many interviewers are in your area. Someone who applies with a 1050 SAT can still get an interview. It is more like 2/3, anyway.</p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>And is it that they trust Columbia alumni to not go to the school for an interview and blow it up or something?</p>
<br>
<p>(I mean that they arent allowing other applicants to go to the campus and interview with an admissions officer. Are they doing that because they cant really trust a random applicant to come to the campus, but they trust an alumnus? It is a stupid comment by me, but whatever.) </p>
<br> [QUOTE=""]
<blockquote> <p>What do you mean by trusting someone to come to campus? Anyone can hop on a plane to NYC and visit the university and take a tour. You only get an interview with an admissions officer if you're a legacy because they don't have the time to interview all 18,000 applicants in person. </p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>How would one seriously have the authority to interview in such a subjective way?</p>
<br>
<blockquote> <p>Every interview is subjective. You'll interview for internships during college, graduate schools, jobs thereafter, etc. I know you're in 9th grade, but this is how life works.</p> </blockquote>
<br>
<p>(Yes, but to me, this seems like the most subjective of all of the process. And the get used to it was harsh.) </p>
<br>
<blockquote> <p>A 45 minute meeting with someone surely is subjective. One admissions officer reading your essay in thirty seconds and deciding whether you're a good fit for Columbia is also subjective. Do you not have teachers who give you grades on subjective assignments (oral presentations, art projects, etc.)? Half of middle in high school grades are about whether the teacher likes you.</p> </blockquote>
<br>