<p>MIT did require 3 when Ben made that comment. :)</p>
<p>And to finish the thought, in case it wasn't clear, MIT now requires 2: a math and a science.</p>
<p>(molliebatmit and I like to finish each other's thoughts. ;) )</p>
<p>Are you allowed to take subject tests in November for Early Action?</p>
<p>This year, scores from the Nov. SATs were received by MIT on Dec. 1 in time for consideration for EA. (See <a href="http://ben.mitblogs.com/archives/2005/12/november_scores.html%5B/url%5D">http://ben.mitblogs.com/archives/2005/12/november_scores.html</a> )</p>
<p>
[quote]
MIT wants over 720 on Math II C and over 760 Math IC
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Regardless, I would take Math II - the curve is amazing. Most people who take both actually score lower on Math I.</p>
<p>Actually a bunch of people I know got the same scores on both. I myself got 720s on both. The collegeboard even says they're supposed to be comparable.</p>
<p>lol gotta love the bell curve</p>
<p>isnt the above stat somewhat generic?</p>
<p>If i took Chinese, Math and Chem, should I still take Physics in Nov.?
How many scores are you guys willing to look at?
would it make a difference if you were picking between two students?</p>
<p>I just felt that since I am in robotics and other engineering related activities, I should have a Physics score just to show the level of my knowledge. </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Why did MIT reduce the number of SAT Subject Tests they require? I'm just curious because it seems a lot of schools did the same.</p>
<p>before , the writing section was not in the SAT I.</p>
<p>Right, most schools required the writing SAT II + 2 others, now they can just say 2 others.</p>
<p>Will January 26 scores be recieved by the deadline?</p>