I certainly wouldn’t recommend it for anyone who doesn’t understand the business well.
It may come as a surprise, but I don’t look at their credit. My primary concerns are the loan to value ratio and the borrower’s “exit strategy”.
Yes, and I won’t make a loan unless I conclude that I’d be perfectly happy owning the property for the amount I’m loaning.
Out of roughly 100 loans we’ve made, we’ve foreclosed on 6 or 7. All but two of those were quick and easy 120 day foreclosures. On one the borrower filed bankruptcy, which delayed the foreclosure a few months, but at the foreclosure sale we were paid all of our principal, interest, and attorney fees.
Then there was the loan from hell. The title company made a mistake on the documents, the borrower disputed the validity of the loan, and a lawsuit ensued. We made the loan ten years ago this month and the case is currently in front of of the state Supreme Court.
The dispute has been irrational, with the combined legal fees for both sides totaling over five times the original loan amount.
Which leads me to the most important point: never make one of these loans without title insurance. Since we required title insurance, none of the legal fees in the above case have fallen on us. We’ve been willing to settle all along, but the borrower and the title company both continue to fight it out, to the tune of over a million dollars per side.
For us, we’re happy with either potential outcome. If the title company prevails we’ll get the property, which is much more valuable than the amount we loaned. If the borrower wins the title company will repay us the original loan amount.
The accounting is a little tricky, but even if we lose, the loan will end up yielding about 4% per year.