<p>I’m inclined to agree with DwightEisenhower concerning whether or not joint concentrators can find room to get all the coursework done. My son, currently just a freshman, is currently investigating a joint concentration.</p>
<p>First, his advisors have been very welcoming of his wish to have a joint concentration. In one field, there has been some skepticism as to whether he could actually accomplish the joint concentration, as their degree requirements are extensive and unbendable. However, their attitude is, if you can work it out, go for it. In fact, it was an advisor for this field who suggested some possible ways to develop the thesis for the joint concentration. The other field’s degree requirements are a little more flexible, and based on their consultation, it looks like he may be able to fashion his joint concentration.</p>
<p>Depending on whether he seeks advanced standing, and if he does, how he does it, he may need to take five courses in one or more semesters. Or not. Remember that some of the courses a student takes in each concentration may count toward the general education requirements.</p>
<p>I also don’t think it’s too early for the original poster to think about this. The fact is that some schools are more receptive to double majors (or whatever label a school applies to the idea of majoring in two different fields simultaneously) than others. Princeton told my son to go jump in a lake. Notre Dame was very open, and indeed, lots and lots of kids at ND double major. Hopkins was somewhere between those two extremes.</p>
<p>Harvard is a little fuzzy when discussing the idea with prospective students. When my son visited last spring, the folks in each of the two departments with which he spoke all said, “No problem! No problem!” but didn’t provide any details about the path thereto.</p>
<p>The reality is that it’s not really terribly straightforward. But it’s far from impossible, or even particularly difficult or chancy.</p>
<p>Harvard’s curricular guide even points out which concentrations readily admit of a joint concentration and which concentrations “prohibit” them. I put “prohibit” in italics because upon further inquiry, even the folks who “prohibit” joint concentrations have told my son, “Well, if you show us how you’re going to get it done, and you show us a good thesis topic, and you demonstrate steady progress, we’ll allow it. It’s just really unusual to do with us.”</p>
<p>Gallifrey, I’d suggest that next year, when you’re a senior, you enter into some serious conversations with department advisors at Harvard, even before you find out whether or not you’re accepted, to gauge just how realistic your joint concentration might be. Frankly, the two disciplines look, to my untutored eye, to be highly-compatible. But I’m not a professor at Harvard. ;-)</p>
<p>My son has found the faculty at the school wonderfully approachable, ready to speak, chat and advise. They have exuded an attitude of helpfulness, of desiring to help him succeed, and enthusiasm about his ideas and his dreams. And they’ve also told him what’s what, what’s possible, what’s less possible, and what’s just not going to happen.</p>
<p>But he’s also found that, at least so far, he has to make the first move. And, to a large degree, he has to know the right questions to ask, because these folks often answer the question that’s asked, not necessarily the questions left unasked, but for which answers are vital.</p>