<p>Hi, all. I'm an asian who is studying about SAT. So with studying about SAT I cannot always get perfect scores at practice test.So I have a question for you guys geniouses who can get perfect scores. How to get perfect scores at SAT??I always choose some wrong answers lol</p>
<p>This is going to be a good one.</p>
<p>LOL u have to be lucky</p>
<p>.Masochist’s very inspiring post for all the 2400-aspirers out there:</p>
<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/602755-tips-2400er.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/sat-preparation/602755-tips-2400er.html</a></p>
<p>Ahhh・・・It seems long time of studying effects for perfect scores</p>
<p>^?? </p>
<p>Umm…</p>
<p>ITS ALL ABOUT being happy and looking good…Not that i would know how to get 2400.</p>
<p>There’s a secret to getting a perfect 2400 without any studying. I could tell you, but then I’d have to kill you.</p>
<p>Judging by the OP’s use of grammar, I think he still has a long way to go. No offence.</p>
<p>^This. It has to be a joke.</p>
<p>Just stop choosing wrong answers.</p>
<p>korean_dreamer,</p>
<p>That is precisely what I was thinking…</p>
<p>But seriously, how do you guys feel about the studying-hours-and-hours-to-get-a-2400 mentality? Personally I don’t see much worth in the SAT if you can train yourself to get a high score. For colleges to look at a score and see anything substantial is beyond me. I would say that once you reach a certain level (2150) there is nothing else the SAT can say about you. Of course you must be a pretty good thinker to get a high score, but there is so much more to life (and college admissions) than the SAT. For instance, I could prepare for years and know all the nuances of the TEST, but I will have gained nothing–no life connections, no greater understanding or knowledge–in doing so. I will be taking the SAT for the first time this October (my junior year) and I will shoot for >2500. I have taken practice tests but I certainly have not dedicated my life to the test. I think I’ll retake it again if I feel I can do better, but I honestly say that it’s almost meaningless. Again, I think there’s no value to saying that you’ve mastered one type of test. People should be focusing on other ways to demonstrate their natural skill and ability. A high score on the SAT does not necessarily do this, by virtue of the fact that it is a very coachable test.</p>
<p>If I get a score I’m pleased with, I say “GREAT! Now back to doing what I want to do, things like physics research, reading, writing, running hurdles for the track team.” These things will get me into college because they are aspects of who I am, unlike an SAT that I can condition myself for. The SAT is a baseline for, not a huge contributing factor in, college admissions.</p>
<p>What do you guys think???</p>
<p>sorry, I meant to say that my goal for the first test is >2250! Oops :)</p>
<p>I think your absolutely crazzssyyyy…and so right. :)</p>
<p>wait, did you mean ** was crazy? What??? How did I seem crazy?</p>
<p>wow -__-…
</p>
<p>Because you stereotyped the people here at CC; but you stereotyped correctly. </p>
<p>SAT’s isn’t the end-all-be-all but it still means alot. And, for many people, it determines their intelligence.</p>
<p>wow. I think my IQ just dropped a few points.</p>
<p>1) the SAT does NOT measure your intelligence. it measures how well you take a test and how well you’ve conformed to society’s idea of standardized testtaking.
2) anything above a 2300ish, I would even go so far as to say 2500ish, is pure. sheer. LUCK. there is no categorical comparison as far as intelligence goes between people who get 2300s and people who get 2400s.
3) calm the **** down. schools look at your profile holistically, and your GPA/rank/transcript are almost ALWAYS far more important than your SAT score.</p>
<p>that is all.</p>
<p>well that’s why fresh101 said “for many.” I think he and I both agree with your assessment. it’s just that others don’t</p>