<p>enough with all the westurbation. you're all talking yourselves in circles. </p>
<p>Wesleyan != Ivy League (that's programming language for Wes DOES NOT EQUAL Ivy League)</p>
<p>You get in to an Ivy, if I was you, I would go there. The name > anything you'll learn at Wesleyan.</p>
<p>UChicago...not so much. There's no doubt it's more prestigious, but the margin is definitely not large enough that it would outweigh the benefits of Wesleyan. </p>
<p>These are (I can only speak to social sciences - History, Government, and to a lesser extent, Econ): </p>
<p>1) Extremely diverse classes for an LAC. I've looked at the course offerings of, for example, Bowdoin and Amherst, and at least in history and gov't, they don't hold a candle to Wes in terms of the diversity and breadth of subjects to study. Wesleyan has a great deal of history courses on countries outside of Europe (this was of utmost importance to me - I feel like there's only so many times you can actually learn something by rehashing the French Enlightenment), for example. If you want Ottoman Empire; British Empire; History of Latin America; India under the British; Mughal India; Russia after 1881; an entire course on Stalin, and another on Gandhi; come here. Wes' government department, while not pre-professional like Georgetown's, is also a very strong one. It takes a liberal arts-type approach to the study of political science: you get your courses on international development and political economy, but there's also lots of political theory and cool seminars on Marxist thought. As for Econ, there's an incredibly strong program here. You work hard, you will get your JPMorgan internship. I am friends with many Freeman Scholars and that's pretty much their career path post-Wesleyan: i-banking. Get serious about Econ, keep your grades above 3.7, and you're golden (Goldman?).</p>
<p>2) This diversity of classes is amazing for an LAC, which status is good because all prestigious LACs provide:</p>
<ul>
<li>smaller classes;</li>
<li>professors who spend time teaching and are accessible;</li>
<li>NO grad students/TAs, at least in all of my classes so far;</li>
</ul>
<p>which lead to you learning a great deal more, because you're actually motivated to go to class and interact with professors, which of course benefit you as well.</p>
<p>3) Wes in particular, because of its smaller size, wide course offerings, lack of required distribution requirements, and INTELLECTUAL ATMOSPHERE (can't stress this enough), further benefits students by giving students like me, who normally would take only history courses, exposure to a great deal of other disciplines through interaction with friends taking different courses of study (English, Spanish, comparative lit, philosophy, etc. etc.), which friends you'll make because Wesleyan as a smaller school fosters a great deal of social interaction with eclectic (and Eclectic) groups of people whom one wouldn't normally encounter, like Freeman Scholars, film majors, members of improv groups, theater geeks, etc. Furthermore the course catalogue is much more accessible than, for example, Brown's Mocha, which has about 4 or 5 times as many courses in it. It's easy to familiarize oneself with WesMaps and find interesting, out of the way courses that are frequently the most interesting.</p>