<p>I've seen the menu. Can some students describe it in more detail?</p>
<p>I ate at crossroads at the OHP program. It wasn't bad.. but i can see myself getting sick of the food pretty fast.. lol. Not bad not bad. 7/10</p>
<p>good variety.</p>
<p>i ate at crossroads... A-</p>
<p>late night at crossroads!</p>
<p>you get sick of it very very quickly. brunch at crossroads is pretty good and the late night food there is outstanding if you are drunk and/or stoned (although they took mozarella sticks of the menu grrrr). that being said, i pretty much lived off bear market in unit 3 my freshman year and ate dinner at my fraternity as much as i could</p>
<p>I ate at crossroads on Cal Day</p>
<p>yuck</p>
<p>I'll give them the benefit of the doubt: it was an enormously busy day. They probably ran out of the good food. But I would say about 4/10</p>
<p>Crossroads is evil. I and a group of other rebels have declared war on Crossroads. CROSSROADS</a> DELENDVM EST</p>
<p>6/10. It's edible, but I'm definitely nooot looking forward to eating there.</p>
<p>It's *<strong><em>ty. Really really *</em></strong>ty. A couple times a week they'll have something edible.</p>
<p>why is everyone concentrating on crossroads? i agree that xroads does not have the best food (their breakfasts used to be better, but for some reason, they hardly ever serve tater tots, bacon, pancakes, or french toast anymore - in other words, the good stuff). cafe 3 is a looooot better, in my opinion. and clark kerr isn't bad. campus cafes are okay too.</p>
<p>foothill's dining hall is really good imo</p>
<p>^Cenire, because they are evil
Foothill has great LateNight.</p>
<p>I've eaten the dorm food. I'm still alive. Barely. :(</p>
<p>Cafe 3 and Clark Kerr are pretty decent dining commons. Foothill supposedly has good Late Night and bad food at any other time. Ramona's has tasty rice bowls...though the chicken is burnt.</p>
<p>I would say...</p>
<p>Crossroads - 5/10, lots of selection, not much good food.</p>
<p>Cafe 3 - 7/10, usually good food, but repetitive.</p>
<p>Clark Kerr - 5/10, quality spotty, hit-or-miss, usually miss.</p>
<p>Foothill - 3/10, generally bad.</p>
<p>How is it Berkeley's dining won this "Ivy Award" with all this lousy food?</p>
<p>2007</a> R&I Ivy Awards: University of California, Berkeley</p>
<p>Because the food's actually fairly good. (In fact, they respond to feedback v. promptly) It's just a natural thing that college students dislike/whine about their dorm food; it happens everywhere.</p>
<p>ihouse isn't bad, they have a decent variety for breakfast the times I've eaten there...</p>
<p>I think that Berkeley, like other public schools, earned a very bad reputation for food/competitiveness/etc back in the early days-when schools like the School Across the Bay were serving fillet mignon and Cal had "chicken." Even back in the 1990's, I remember eating at Foothill and not being impressed-and little children are easily impressed. </p>
<p>But now, with this new culinary expert-most likely hired in order to ameliorate this bad reputation-it seems as though Berkeley has began to improve its menu. Perhaps one day it shall be rated as high as other local schools <em>cough</em> <em>cough</em>.</p>