<p>I do not think I am getting “super academic,” whatever that means. I am certain that the first reference to “altruism” is appealing to the philosophical definition. Given his repetitiveness I suppose the rest follows suit?</p>
<p>With his attempt at reviewing me and my personality, it is only fitting that I reply with ad hominen arguments. Also, I am not at all angry, so I suppose joecart may after all be better at reviewing people than others?</p>
<p>Ah no, both of you missed the point of my “last quip.” The point was, my being altruistic and cocky does not undermine my ability to judge, albeit “from a high place.” It is about me and my arguable competency, as opposed to about other individuals and their lack thereof.</p>
<p>I might as well answer for the one-liner exaggerations. Aside from the fact that I find it unfitting for one to exaggerate at all when one judges, particular a supposedly fellow human being, I also find it interesting that whereas I am expected to interpret your posts metaphorically, my posts are meant to be literal to the word.</p>