<p>
</p>
<p>Most scientists admit that science is flawed, with the possibility of drastic flaws that might not be seen for generations.</p>
<p>So, if science is “better than anything else we can do”, and it is shaky, uncertain, and possibly flawed, shouldn’t we just stop trying?</p>
<p>Ultimately, do we NEED to know the things that we use science to try and discover? For the most part, no.</p>