<p>My secrets are better!!!</p>
<p>A person who actually COULD score a 2400 wouldn’t need to hear the generic test taking secrets. Most 2400 scorers start at around 2300 without much studying and ultimately realize that with studying they can obtain perfect scores.</p>
<p>All of these discussions make me want to sleep through the SAT for a perfect 600.</p>
<p>Thats not true AT ALL. Almost no one just starts out at a 2300; thats ridiculous. Those who originally score lower can obtain good scores with enough practice.</p>
<p>Granted, I may be the only person who ever has or ever will start out as low as a 1750 and obtain a perfect score.</p>
<p>Thats the spirit, prove everyone wrong by getting a 2400. You can do it, just remember to post a screenshot when you receive your results.</p>
<p>all-ivy_academic, I’m not doubting that you can get a 2400, but I personally think that you should spend the time focusing on other things besides SAT scores. SAT scores is just one small part of the application, and IMO, the time spent for studying SAT can be spent doing something more worthwhile. I’m not saying don’t study for the SAT, but I’m just saying you don’t NEED a 2400 as you said in the title of your thread.</p>
<p>"Thats not true AT ALL. Almost no one just starts out at a 2300; thats ridiculous. Those who originally score lower can obtain good scores with enough practice.</p>
<p>Granted, I may be the only person who ever has or ever will start out as low as a 1750 and obtain a perfect score."</p>
<p>The statement “Almost no one starts out with a perfect score” implies that the number of people who get 2400 is greater than the number that start at 2300+. Although I do not agree that only 2300+ can achieve 2400, it is not an easy task still. A large number that DO start out with 2300 will never reach 2400.</p>
<p>And people that start out with 1750s do not generally reach 2400 for a simple reason. They are not smart enough. Period. Now stop posting and just let it die.</p>
<p>Come back in 20 years or so, when the SAT adds a new section so that you can get your 2400 out of like 3600 or something.</p>
<p>Lol, touche!</p>
<p>1750 to 2400 is impossible over the span of a year.</p>
<p>Why don’t you show me one case where someone has done it. And when you get your score and it’s not 2400, make sure to show us all what it is so we can add you to the list of people who didn’t do it.</p>
<p>Harsh, but it’s true.</p>
<p>i need to get a 2400…</p>
<p>no one NEEDS a 2400.</p>
<p>I’m going to be the first to do it</p>
<p>^ahahahahaha</p>
<p>good joke.</p>
<p>There probably have been others that have done it before, its just that those people did not have cognitive atrophy.</p>
<p>edit: happy?</p>
<p>That is harsh kho, you should know better than that. Cognitive Atrophy is more like it- Or intellectually challenged.</p>
<p>Actullay, he does not really have cognitive atrophy.</p>
<p>Atrophy comes from disuse, but his problems stems from a lack of cognitive ability, not the atrophying of his ability.</p>
<p>It wasn’t as bad when he first started this post, now its ridiculous. That accounts for some atrophy does it not? Please let this thread die.</p>
<p>^It counts for no atrophy at all. You are completely wrong Quix, kho has you beat and always will have you beat. Deal with it</p>
<p>This thread is only going to die when you people stop caring.</p>
<p>Since when was i trying to um, beat, kho ? I think you are just confused. </p>
<p>By the way, you sound very dirty.</p>
<p>Well, I haven’t taken a shower yet and I just got back from the gym…how’d you know?</p>