<p>For some time, Romney has been touted as the VP, as he would bring economic experience, offsetting McCain's self-proclaimed lack of understanding. I believe Newjack posted a thread with a link to an article stating that Republican insiders said that Romney is the new VP.</p>
<p>However, I will go out on a limb and say that I'm positive it's Pawlenty. Consider intrade.com: Intrade</a> Prediction Markets</p>
<p>Click "Republican VP" (fourth from top). In the last twelve hours, stock in Pawlenty has soared by 45 points, while that in Romney has plummeted 25 points. Real money is involved (for some), so I'm surprised that the recent changes are that drastic. Given the lack of press about specific VP contenders, I feel confident that something is going on.</p>
<p>So, bring on the predictions. I would love to hear opinions about the strengths of the potential VP picks, and, once the VP is announced tomorrow, the advantages and disadvantages of the VP nominee.</p>
<p>NOTE: This is NOT a thread to support or bash McCain. Let us please stick to the VP nominees as much as possible.</p>
<p>Lieberman has a proven track record as a weak VP debater. Romney has too much money and too many houses. That leaves Pawlenty, who Biden will eat for lunch in a debate. :)</p>
<p>I personally believe that the best VP pick for John McCain would be Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal.</p>
<p>He can offset McCain's age which apparently turns people off, and at the same time bring the energy to McCain's campaign that he seriously lacks. Bobby Jindal is to the republicans is what Obama is to the dems.
He's young and different.</p>
<p>If McCain picked Bobby I would maybe consider supporting him, but after these last 8 years, he could pick Jesus as his running mate and I wouldnt vote for him.</p>
<p>Jindal would be a pretty poor choice. He would be destroyed in a debate. He even got flustered on Meet the Press when he was asked what new ideas John McCain is proposing.</p>
<p>Honestly, Biden could destroy most VP candidates in a debate. I agree that Romney would have been the hardiest, but I don't see the point of a single debate when the VP may be talented at other things and be a good candidate in office for the next four or eight years.</p>
<p>That being said, I was also thinking that it would be Pawlenty. If that's the case, I feel almost sorry for McCain, because Pawlenty will be steamrollered.</p>
<p>I was wrong... But this is an interesting choice. I think she sounds great. As a person.</p>
<p>We'll see how persuasive she is politically. Just as I have become more impressed with Obama's campaigning skills (though I think we lost some of the original Obama in the mess), I hope that she can prove a owrthy contender.</p>