<p>did you guys really find paper 2 to be that hard? i thought it really wasnt that bad…even the math induction proof with the matrices was easy (and the section B questions were pretty easy as a whole, unlike paper 1’s section b). paper 1 was kinda tough (i know i got at least a 5, maybe a 6), but i thought paper 2 was relatively easy (I am sure I got a 7 on it)…
that question on paper 1 all about f(x+y)=f(x)f(y) was the most confusing thing ever though.</p>
<p>and i dont know what you are talking about regarding ibh math being death - nothing trumps the impossibility of ibh chemistry…</p>
<p>hmmm I don’t remeber a question on induction prooft with matrices… are you TZ0, TZ1 or TZ2?</p>
<p>spangie, I’m tz2, and I totally agree with you. Paper 1 = piece of cake. Paper 2 = unholy *%@$. Yeah, there were no inducion with matrices questions on p.2. I kinda thought that there would be one, because they always have a big question on matrices, or lines and space, or calculus at the end. It was trig. Really bad trig. Really huuuuhhh? trig. I would have taken calculus, lines, planes, matrices; anything over that paper. I did love paper 1, though; full of complex numbers and lines and planes 
:D</p>
<p>omg. i soooo regret taking math hl now. someone plz shoot me. IM SO SCARED!!!</p>
<p>Hey… I’m new to this forum… but yeah just sat the Nov 09 paper 1 today. It was ridiculous. Doubt it was any better than May 09. I think the guys in the 2008 sessions had it way easier.</p>
<p>Anyone taking the test this year? </p>
<p>Two weeks left!!!</p>
<p>lol Next year. Next year.</p>
<p>Damn this is a nightmare story.</p>
<p>lol. I’m expecting a 7.</p>
<p>I’m shooting for a 5 or 6, though I probably will get a 4…</p>
<p>Bump… Paper 1 is tomorrow!</p>
<p>Have fun.</p>
<p>Practicing on paper 1s.</p>
<p>Okay guys just to clarify has anyone else like been frantically asking their teachers if they’re still going to pass if they fail HL maths? coz after paper 1 its not looking good to be honest.</p>