<p>So, I took the IB program, and here's what I have to say:</p>
<p>First off, let me admit, yes, IB does seem to do a better job preparing you mentally and work-ethically (this is a new word forum) than AP. I feel smarter than my AP counterparts just by talking to them. In IB you think about a lot more stuff, you research a lot more, and do things a lot deeper ... generally more critical thinking stuff. The reason I say this is because it seems like AP is much more into memorizing than thinking, whereas IB is a lot of readthinkcompareanalyze modgepodge. However, AP definitely does a better job with physics (IB doesn't even offer calc based physics) and the SL level physics is nothing compared to AP Physics B. Also, like someone else said, CAS, EE, TOK, those can really kick your ass ... but in a way that makes you smarter. Harder, but better for it. Yeahhhh....</p>
<p>What really SUCKS though is how it's compared with AP. IB is clearly more difficult when comparing course for course with AP, especially with the internal assessments (major projects) and junk. However, AP gets more credits in colleges, and AP can start as early as 9th grade - a luxury IB students do not have when it comes to cumulative rigorousness. Also, compared to the Math HL, the Calc BC exam is like eating delicious chocolate cake (for the series and differential equations options of the HL exam in particular). </p>
<p>SO, in conclusion, AP is easier, recognized the same, gives a lot of advantages when it comes to college apps, BUT ... IB will challenge you more and probably make you into a smarter person. Which one are you in for, intrinsic or merit benefits? The choice is yours.</p>
<p>*Note: I see your school doesn't offer math up to Math HL. Attempt to do it self study, or something. I took Math HL, then took the AP Calc BC exam, and got a 5, so you can do both, but you definitely cannot take the AP Calc class and get a good grade on the Math HL exam (just not enough breadth OR depth).</p>