<p>I agree-- way too much marketing, but that's an interesting (and smart, in my opinion!) position your Merck friend has taken. Hmm . . .</p>
<p>The problem with waiting a year is for the age group of girls who are beginning to be sexually active, may became sexually active during that year, or have had a very limited number of partners (that may soon increase), in which case waiting will affect the effectiveness of the vaccine. It's definitely a tough call. I'm a fan of the idea to wait a year or two for middle school girls, but for older girls I'd probably side with the vaccine--at least, that's what I will probably be doing for myself after talking to my doctor (my pediatrician last year recommended it; I will ask my new doctor this year his opinion).</p>
<p>I've never seen these commercials. Do I need to watch more TV? :)</p>
<p>In addition to all of the shots your kids are getting for their college physicals...remind them to get a flu shot when the college offers them in the fall. It's about $20-25, and my kids have gotten it every year. Too many people living in too close quarters.</p>
<p>My younger s went for his annual physical not too long agoand we happened to find out that they were doing a study on the new meningitis vaccine (all active drug- just comparing different lots). He qualified, it covered the full cost of the physical, he had to keep a log of any side effects for a week or 2 (there were none) and he had to go back for a (free) follow-up appointment. Annd, he got paid $100!! He was a happy camper!</p>
<p>re: Gardasil.</p>
<p>Before choosing this vaccine, it would be wise to read the fine print. HPV may cause some cervical cancers. Gardasil may guard against some viruses. The vaccine may not prevent all HPV or all cervical cancer. The long-term effects are unknown. Weigh the benefits against the risks.</p>