<p>I graduated from HS in 74. I’ve always considered myself an “over-achiever” because I did better in school than on standardized tests. I had to work hard to get good grades, but I enjoyed doing so, and I always liked to be around kids who were smarter than me. I especially liked, and did well in math. With S1, who is also good in math, I joked that I could never get into the schools he applied to with my old “stats.” Things have indeed changed, but I believe being a girl interested in math in the 70’s worked in my favor.</p>
<p>I had a scholarship to a prep school in Massachusetts (boarding school). We had a very strange grading scale at that time, with narrative reports, and I don’t believe the school ranked. However, I was in “Cum Laude” society. We did have a few AP classes. Being a math nerd, I took AP calc (2 years) and physics (one year). But I don’t recall what else was offered. We did have a variety of extra-curricular opportunities; by my junior and senior year, all my “free” time was spent doing theater production. I was also a student leader in the dorm, and worked in the computer center (where one of my jobs was vacuuming up the chads from the punch tape…). I received a school math award in my junior year. I did not have interesting summer experiences, because I had to earn money in a summer job.</p>
<p>Being a prep school, everything was geared to getting us into the right colleges. The school scheduled the board tests, but I don’t recall any prep classes, except for a brief orientation and some comments about not guessing. My scores were lopsided - 700’s in math, high 500’s in verbal. I took 6 achievement tests (now SATII) and did very well on math 2, physics, and Latin, average in history, chem, and English. My average score did not break 700!</p>
<p>In junior year, we all had to meet with our counselor, who gave us a list of 15 or so schools to look at and do research on. They had all kinds of guidebooks and catalogs in the guidance office. We were instructed to find at least 6 that we liked and then send a letter asking for a catalog and application (no internet and “viewbooks” then!) Senior year, we met with the counselor again to discuss our choices. We were encouraged to pick 4 - a reach, 2 matches, and a safety. Many colleges sent interviewers to our campus, so we signed up to interview with the colleges we picked. There really was not an opportunity to go and visit. I know that the interviewers also talked to the counselors about the applicants, and that is probably how we were “ranked” against each other. As I recall, the counselor secured the teacher recommendations, and we were responsible for the applications (hand-written) and essays (type-written).</p>
<p>My reach was Dartmouth (VERY popular at my school that year.) I got waitlisted. I got into MIT and Harvey Mudd (my “matches”) and Carnegie Mellon (my “safety”). As one poster stated, chances have really changed since then! Mudd actually admitted me in the middle of February (not EA or ED). They sent me a special letter that said they voted to accept me early because there was no doubt I would be accepted later. I still have the cool certificate they sent me. </p>
<p>By March, I had decided that Mudd was the school for me; my parents did not want to send their child across the continent to California, but the scholarship offer from Mudd sealed the deal. I never saw the college, and I had never flown on a jet, but in the fall, I traveled all by myself on a 747 from Kennedy to LAX. My suitcase and 2 trunks were filled with Shetland sweaters, plaid skirts, and corduroy pants that I rarely wore in the smoggy SoCal sunshine! I was no longer a preppy… I was a Mudder.</p>