<p>I think the IB needs to be demystified. There is nothing in the curricular content that is magic. The instruction and the delivery of the program are only as good as the teachers. Our school happens to have a lot of experienced IB teachers and students who are well prepared to take the IB- so the program is well taught and students do well. This is an international school and the IB program has been in place for a long time. </p>
<p>Students also do well who do not do the full diploma. Each of my sons took a mixture of IB and AP classes. Each sat 7-8 external exams ultimately and did great on all of them. One son took IB Standard Physics and then did a bit of self study and took the AP Physics B exam and got a 5. The other son took the same class and took the IB Standard exam and got a 7. Same class, different tests, great scores. Now I am thinking if the IB instruction or content or whatever was really that different than the AP in this domain, there is truly no way this would have happened.</p>
<p>Another example, son #2 originally took IB Standard Econ. As the course went on he decided he wanted to do IB Higher the next year... and he did. In fact, however, he took the Ap Exams, Micro and Macro and got 5 on each. Again, if there were not a lot of overlay between these classes, if the instructional models had to be that different, then there is no way he could have achieved this or moved easily from Standard to Higher. </p>
<p>The only subject where this was not the case was Spanish- son #1 took HL Spanish but then the AP exam (!) and had a 3 I think...not a great score after so much SPanish...</p>
<p>So, why didn;t they do 'full IB'? Clearly they were capable...a few reasons. They wanted the English teachers who taught the AP sequence. They did not want to take a single science for 3 years (which is how the HL science classes work at our school). They wanted to pick and choose. They took AP English and Calculus...IB classes for nearly everything else, but also a college prep Biology class (the only alternative to the full IB sequences). One of them took TOK as well, he was able to persuade the teacher to let him take it.</p>
<p>Both did plenty of CAS, not because they had to, but because they wanted to. Neither wrote a 4,000 word paper, to my knowledge. But, son #1 did write a very excellent Harry Potter parody in the time that would have taken, and son#2 re-wrote the school's disciplinary code working with the vice principal.</p>
<p>The IB classes might have had a bit less rote, I don;t know. There was no rote learning in AP English or Calculus, I am sure of that. Critical thinking skills should be an end goal for all HS classes. All upper level English students are learning to read analytically and write succinctly, aren't they? </p>
<p>IB is not the be all and end all, even for international kids like my sons. They might have been a bit more 'portable' had they done full IB, but the fact is that the program and the courses offered vary A LOT from school to school- hence the transferability is not what it is meant to be. </p>
<p>To my mind, this is an imposed curricular approach that may or may not suit kids at a time in their lives when their minds are likely to change about things. Do kids of this age really need to be wedded to 2 year curricular commitments? My older son took electronic music and technical theater classes that were infinitely more stimulating to him than doing 3 years of physics would have been (he did 4 years of science in high school). Both boys did 5 or 6 core classes each year..plus TOK for #2. </p>
<p>As for college admissions results, from our school it is a wash. The kids who get into ultracompetitive schools IN THE US are as likely to have done full IB diplomas as a mixture of IB and AP. The one good thing about IB classes, even in the first year of a sequence the grades are weighted, which does make a difference overall for some things in the end...</p>
<p>At our school the kids going to Uni in Europe or Australia need great IB results. The expectations are high and everyone, whether they are going to the US or elsewhere, wants to do well on the IB or AP exams. This reduces senioritis...certainly. </p>
<p>I think "heydad" is right on as he acknowledges that assuming that every kid is well served by a program like this is presuming one can fit a square peg in a round hole. Not only soccer-playing-greats-to-be might find it ill suited to their needs!</p>