Interesting Interview Story...

<p>I find it interesting how much high school seniors put stock in the transformative power of interviews. This is what Princeton says about interviews:
"What role do alumni/ae interviewers and the interview itself play in the admission process?
We try to offer all applicants the opportunity to have a conversation with an alumnus or alumna as a way for them to learn more about the overall Princeton experience. Our interviewers, who are volunteer members of Princeton’s Alumni Schools Committees, will contact applicants and arrange a convenient time and place to meet in the student’s local area. Interviewers write down reflections about the conversations, which we then include among the various other components of the application. Interviews are not required as part of the admissions process, but we encourage candidates to accept the invitation. Applicants who live in parts of the United States or around the world where there are no available Alumni Schools Committee members should not be concerned if an interview is not possible. We can give an application full consideration without an interview having taken place." </p>

<p>Notice that they say from their perspective the primary purpose of the interview is to inform the student about Princeton. Princeton never says the interview is given significant weight in their decision making.</p>

<p>As for “training,” Princeton says “Princeton Schools Commitee (PSC) supports and assists alumni interviewers via Alumni Schools Committees (ASCs) throughout the world, helping to assure that they deliver a consistent level of high quality service to applicants and to Princeton. PSC works with the Admission Office to set standards, guidelines and policies for local ASC operations.”</p>

<p>The applicant interview is the most subjective part of the entire admission’s process. This level of “training” is not sufficient for an admission’s officer to have any degree of confidence in inferences to be drawn from what an interviewer reports. </p>

<p>An interview is like deciding a spot in the NFL playoffs through a coin toss. You have to get past a lot of other tie breakers before the coin toss is used.</p>

<p>In addition, I suspect that far more interviewers send in enthusiastic reports about the young people they meet than can be admitted to the school. </p>

<p>Many students have walked out of interviews thinking they have substantially boasted their chances because they hit it off so well with their interviewers, but the reality is that grades; coursework; SATs; teacher and guidance counselor recommendations; EC’s; essays; and preferences for athletes, legacies, and URMs will have already decided whether you get the thick or thin envelope long before how you did on an interview comes into play.</p>

<p>
[quote]
"Notice that they say from their perspective the primary purpose of the interview is to inform the student about Princeton."

[/quote]
</p>

<p>firstly, i don't think P'ton would say something like "interviews are a highly evaluative process that carry much weight in admissions..." they want to see the person in their normal state and behavior. they don't want everyone to get worked up and rehearse answering various types of questions.</p>

<p>besides, if it was only to help students understand P'ton better, they wouldn't require the alums to write a page report on 90% of 17,000 or so applicants each year</p>

<p>I think that the interview has little to no value in the admissions decisions. When I had my interview last week, my interviewer said that she had once written a letter to Princeton that said "if you were to choose between me and applicant X, choose applicant X". However, this applicant was rejected even though my interviewer has been doing interviews for almost 30 years and, therefore, should be a relatively good judge!</p>

<p>I would recommend reading Michele Hernandez's book "A is For Admission". As a former admissions officer at Dartmouth, she even states that the interview rarely affects admission decisions.</p>

<p>P'ton does not say something like "interviews are a highly evaluative process that carry much weight in admissions” because interviews do not carry much weight in admissions. The reason why colleges like the SATs is because they are standardized tests with high reliability. Alumni interviews have very low reliability. If an applicant is interviewed by five different persons there is a very strong possibility that at least some of them will write very different things about the applicant. Besides, the interviewer meets you for a hour. Your teachers have seen you every day. Princeton places much more weight upon what your teachers write about you then what an interviewer does.</p>