<p>I just remembered. In my government class we were talking of affirmitive action and those cases in the supreme court. There were two case that i can think of they both came from University of Michigan law school... Interesting...</p>
<p>Yeah it was Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger (2003): Numerical benefits cannot be used to admit minorities into college, but race can be a "plus factor" in making those decisions</p>
<p>Slight correction: only one of them (Grutter) was a law school case. The other (Gratz et al) was for undergrad.</p>
<p>Does the university practice aff action for undergrad</p>
<p>Up until December 22nd it does. Whether it does after that depends on the stay the U has asked for -- it's asked the courts to allow it to complete the year using the system it devised after the Supreme Court decision. </p>
<p>Next year, it won't. There has been passed in MI a constitutional amendment banning it. For the fall 2008 entering class, the U will act in compliance with the amendment.</p>