<p>After reading this thread, quite frankly, I am disgusted with what I have read. Most of the posts are riddled with entitlement and a remarkable sense of egotism, especially coming from parents. It is understandable and natural for any parent to be concerned about the well-being of their child. However, within this thread the level of helicopter parenting and the overtly apparent lack of independence granted to 18 year olds is alarming. </p>
<pre><code> In a matter of months these adults will be moving on from the plush suburban home, moving to institutions of higher learning across the nation from large metropolitan cities to tiny hamlets. To the poster, if you are on this short of a leash, how are you ready for college? Are you ready to leave and live on your own? Trust me, regardless of whether you are going to the city or to the boondocks, you will run into people far scarier and far more dangerous than the doctor or the attorney who attended university 30 years ago and is sitting in his study in the blazer and tie with a pad of paper waiting to learn about you and answer your questions. You will be living on your own, without mom in the mini-van down the block on campus watching as you go from class to class, there will be no meetings with professors to make sure they pass the litmus test for allowing you to attend office hours, and there won't be an opportunity to make sure you never once step across the perceived line that has been so rigidly set.
The suggestion that an alumni interviewer, from any esteemed institution that grants interviews to students in the first place, who is referred and working with the institution, and has provided name, address, phone number, and e-mail could possibly pose more of a threat to the safety of our children than the stalker on an urban campus, or the frat party that gets out of control, or the thief who has strolled onto campus late at night to get his hands on that brand new laptop you are carrying back to your room is absolutely absurd and shows how out-of-touch with reality people truly are.
While it is somewhat common to meet in a public place, it is not at all out of the ordinary to meet at the interviewer's home. A large minority of interviews occur in the privacy of the interviewer's home. That doesn't mean that because they are not in a public space an assault will occur. It's actually quite flattering to have someone who is working a full time job, and volunteering whatever excess time they have left to invite you into the privacy and comfort of their home and learn about you, answer your questions, and hopefully serve as an advocate for you in your admissions file. Additionally, the suggestion that because the interviewer is male we can't allow our children into his home is probably one of the most disgraceful, offensive, and ludicrous remarks I have read in my adult life. I don't think I need to explain how short-sighted and unreasonable a statement that is. It is presumptuous, out-of-line, and unprofessional to make the assumption that because someone is male, they are naturally inclined to want to invite female students into their homes to have their way with them. Step back for a moment and think, does anyone realize the liability that the situation would create for the school? Obviously, the school is confident in their interviewers and has taken the appropriate measures to be assured to a reasonable degree that the interviewer is not going to "pull a fast one" and cost them countless dollars in lawsuits and a reputation that many of these schools have been building for hundreds of years.
I think it is appropriate for us to pull back from the sensationalized reporting of the kidnappings, the rapes, and the murders. To be frank, it isn't as prevalent as you'd think. Sure it happens, and yes, it is sad and upsetting, but if you constantly live your life in fear, what kind of a life is that? I'd ask anyone to search Google or any newspaper for a story of anything similar to this in nature. I searched and came up empty, which didn't come as any surprise. It's natural to be concerned about our children, I understand and sympathize with that, however it is a ridiculous assertion to believe that everyone is out to snatch your perfect daughter or son. If you as a parent are comfortable with influencing your child to live a sheltered life so much to the point that you won't allow them to go to the home of an alumni interviewer associated with the school your child is applying to, then I will keep you in my thoughts, because frankly you need some help. Turn off the Fox News, turn on your brain.
In closing, I'd like to address the poster of the comment directed to the former alumni interviewer from Tufts. You should be ashamed of yourself. Your mean-spirited, rude, and unhelpful commentary to someone attempting to be helpful was neither funny nor necessary. Again, I agree we need to be mindful of our children's safety, but I hope logic and clear thinking will prevail in situations like these.
</code></pre>