I had my interview back in January, but I just realized that I want to put this out there, both for applicants and interviewers.
I don’t think I “bombed” the interview (I mean, it’s kind of hard to really really screw it up, right?) but it definitely wasn’t the best. It certainly wasn’t as good as my Yale interview.
I’ll admit, part of it might’ve been my fault. The Brown interview had a lot more oddball questions than Yale (don’t know if this is a theme in Brown interviews or if it was just this interviewer) and I was thrown for a loop several times. Perhaps I should have prepared better, but I had already had my Yale interview and that went well, and I didn’t want to over-prepare and seem scripted and unnatural. I also don’t know how I could have prepared for some of those questions, because they were just that unexpected.
My interviewer was young. I think he graduated only a year or two ago. This may have been his first year of interviewing, so, imo, he wasn’t a great interviewer. I mean, I’ve never interviewed anybody, so I guess it’s not my place to judge, but here’s a few things that threw me off:
He was using his laptop to read off his questions and take notes the whole time. We barely made any eye contact through the whole 50 minutes, and it’s really hard to connect with somebody and have a conversation with them when they never look at you. Even when it was over, we said “have nice day” “Nice meeting you” etc, but he was typing the whole time. I tried making eye contact to see if we were going to shake hands or anything, but nothing, so I just awkwardly walked away.
My Yale interviewer didn’t take notes, I’m guessing he wrote stuff down right after while it was still fresh in his mind. The Yale interviewer also didn’t seem to have super prepared questions, just went with the flow of the conversation, which was more what I was expecting based on what other people said. Which brings me to the second point with my Brown interviewer: He had very prepared questions, I could tell he was reading them from his laptop, and it very much jumped from topic to topic. It felt more like a question and answer session a than a conversation, and it felt very unnatural whenever I would ask him questions throughout the interview.
For some reason I had never considered the possibility that I could get a not so good interviewer. It seems obvious, but I guess I was just so focused on not being a bad interviewee. I guess my point is that this is probably one of the reasons the admissions officers take the interviews with a grain of salt. There’s a variety of factors that can go into a not so stellar interview, and it’s not always a reflection of the applicant.
My Brown interview didn’t go great, but I don’t think it was all my fault. I’m not saying this to complain, but I guess the biggest thing this whole college application process has taught me is (cue the cheesy music) that a lot can happen and you have to give up the idea of being able to control everything. I also would like any interviewers that might read this to maybe take a lesson from it.