<p>@ creative1: Basically, he was asked about ECs and in expressing his amazement at having so many options he said, "I don't know what I would do," which was written down at the interview as meaning he had no interest. The Dean of Admission told me in March that that note was the zinger. </p>
<p>That's not to say that he would have otherwise been admitted or that he would have chosen that school. I'm convinced that they made the right call...even though in that case I think they cut off a few more minutes of discussion before reaching the same decision that they reached on that misinterpretation/ambiguous reply.</p>
<p>But let's suppose that there is a fit and the hypothetical applicant would otherwise be accepted...but for a comment like that. How could you prevent it from happening? Well, interview practice/coaching would reduce the chances, but I think that's where the parent interview is important.</p>
<p>I think one of the questions that a parent should ask during the parent-interview is whether there's anything about your child that you can explain or clarify for the interviewer. You can ask this about things that stand out positively and negatively.</p>
<p>That would be the practical, corrective step that I would take. I would try to talk straight with the interviewer as a parent. When I sat down with interviewers I was sort of grooving along with the whole "Well, I just loved your son. He's sooooo charming!" line. Instead, I should have gotten down to business and probed more.</p>
<p>Most of the interviewers I encountered were expert at blowing sunshine up my posterior before the applications went in, but I know -- from numerous conversations afterwards -- that they have the capacity to be frank and candid. To do this in the fall, however, may require a corresponding level of candor on your part as a parent. But why not? So what if, in the process of being frank, you reveal a wart or blemish that makes the Admissions Committee decide your child won't be a good fit? They know which types of kids do best at their school, right?</p>
<p>And -- at least in theory -- if you're being brutally honest, then they know what they're getting and will have confidence that, when the veil is lifted the next fall, they won't discover that they've married a toad.</p>
<p>I had no trouble being very honest myself. But I was extremely slack about holding the interviewer to the same standard. I soaked in their praise for D'yer, Jr. and never questioned them or doubted their sincerity about him.</p>
<p>Think about how awkward you would feel if you were asked by the interviewer to explain what reservations and doubts you had about the school. My tendency would be to heap on the praise on the school, at least as heavily as they heaped the praise on my D'yer, Jr. I don't think getting them to give their honest impression of your child is as simple as sharing your honest impression of him. And if you're coming from Japan, the cultural impediment to being so direct (almost confrontational) could be insurmountable. </p>
<p>But, to do it all over again, I think I'd try to press for more honest dialogue by pressing the interviewer to use his or her time with me to get my candid views as to the things that the interviewer is most impressed by and most concerned with. And then, after they just talk about the things they say are impressive, I'd push again to have them get a better handle on what concerns them.</p>