<p>It took me weeks to finally narrow down my decision to attend Cornell, after going back and forth between it and UChicago. Disturbingly enough, I found that one of the main factors that was keeping me from definitively choosing Cornell was all this terrible commentary going on about it. Disgusted with myself, I finally shook it off and realized that Cornell is an amazing school (so is UChicago, nothing against it either!) and it's just awful how terrible people are being about it!</p>
<p>1) The power the US Rankings has over people is ridiculous. Since when has a mere number had the ability to deem a school "terrible"? Moreover, even if its ranking is #15, why is that something to be ashamed of? Last I checked, 15 out of the 132840357098254733429743573948 colleges there are in the nation is not bad at all. In fact, its GREAT. Sometimes I wish Cornell didn't have the Ivy League tag on it, because people seem to think non-Ivy League schools like Vanderbilt, JHU, Rice, Northwestern, WashU, etc. are amazing, despite their being lower ranked than other Ivy Leagues.</p>
<p>2) I don't understand how there can possibly be a WORST IVY LEAGUE. Ivy Leagues are Ivy Leagues for a reason, aren't they? It's like an oxymoron. I'll admit, HYP have their great names/rankings for a reason, but to say that Cornell be excommunicated from the Ivy League is just taking it too far. Cornell's engineering program is within the top in the nation, their vet school is number 1, their medical school is in the top 15, as well as countless other high-ranked graduate/undergraduate programs. Cornell has clearly proven that it is more than deserving to have a place in the Ivy League, so people really need to stop hating.</p>
<p>3) Cornell is known for it's rigour - students work ridiculously hard to maintain their GPAs. Some graduate schools take that into consideration when adressing Cornell applicants. How can a school that instills such great worth ethic, that makes students work to EARN their grades, be BAD? I just don't get it.</p>
<p>4) Cornell is undeniably the largest Ivy League institution. Founder Ezra Cornell created this school in the hopes of preserving diversity, and offering every possible venue for ANY kind of student. So, because it obviously has more available seats to make this mission possible, this means more students are accepted. It's a simple equation: larger class size = more students. Naturally, the acceptance rate will be a bit higher, so why do people use its acceptance rate as grounds for its "terribleness"? If Cornell cut their class size in half, then there acceptance rate would be on par with the more selective Ivy Leagues. Its shallow that people fail to look beyond a mere percentage (which is still extremely selective - 18% of about 60,000 applicants? Not shabby at all.). UChicago has something like a 26-27% acceptance rate - how come no one challenges its #9 ranking?</p>
<p>5) I ask any individual to attend Cornell and tell me that the students who study there are stupid. Its ridiculous to say so, because such gifted people attend and do such wonderful things. Cornell is a breeding ground for talented people of all kinds, and its a shame for their achievements (merely getting accepted for one thing) to be undermined simply for going to "the Worst Ivy League".</p>
<p>Ok, my rant is over, and thanks to all who took the time to read it. Again, I'm not trying to undermine any other schools, I just wish all this hate on Cornell would cease, because it literally is futile. Feel free to oppose/agree with me - this is a discussion board after all!</p>