is Dartmouth intellectual?

<p>According to some recent posts, Dartmouth students are not "intellectual." </p>

<p>While I am certainly very excited about Dartmouth (and will be attending in the fall), that comment, to be honest, worries me. Any comments?</p>

<p>I think Dartmouth students tend to have a lot of fun which makes some perceive it to be non-intellectual. I've found that having a good time and having intellectual conversation and big dreams are hardly mutually exclusive. I had countless intellectual conversations at Dartmouth and an unbeliveably fantastic academic experience. i wouldn't worry at all.</p>

<p>Dartmouth can hardly be characterized as intellectual. Most people here take gut classes to fulfill their distribs. The student body is extremely preprofessional (business, law school, and med school type-A personalities). I took several higher level Economics classes here, and the toolish people in those classes (all prospective Investment banker types) basically killed my desire to continue on with the Department. Sure intellectual discourse and intellectual people DO exist. In fact, my inner circle of friends mainly consists of those types of people (so if you look very hard, you CAN find them. But it's hard...took me about a year). But the point is, this intellectual culture you're looking for is hardly prevalent at Dartmouth.</p>

<p>Taking a snippet from the Columbia boards, the frats and athletics "rule" at Dartmouth. I would suggest Chicago, Reed, Harvey Mudd, and Caltech as the ultimate intellectual schools in this country. </p>

<p>Sorry slipper, we're going to yin-yang on this one.</p>

2 Likes

<p>Hmm, I'd say schools like Williams/Amherst are intellectual places... though athletics are big at Williams, the student body is truly exceptional.
And Yale is a HUGE intellectual haven.
I would say Chicago is the most "intellectual" college out of the ones you listed, aerial.</p>

<p>Chandler, have you been to Williams?</p>

<p>I'll say what I said in another thread, any school with kids that have the stats they have at Dartmouth is oozing with intellect. At some schools, they wear it on their sleeve and take great pride in feeling they have daily intellectual discourse--that would be Chicago, Reed, Swat and several others. You'll find more at those schools will seek PhD's and fewer will head to Wall Street.</p>

<p>At Dartmouth, Princeton and Williams you have brilliant kids who do tend to be weighted towards the pre professional. It will be much harder to find a group intensely discussing Plato in the common room on Friday night. </p>

<p>Are the kids at Chicago any smarter than the kids at Dartmouth. No. Are they in general different? You bet! Are they more intellectual? Depends on how you define the word.</p>

<p>It is very important to understand at which group of schools you would feel more comfortable, so read up on the cultures at these schools.</p>

<p>Aerialblue, you have become a completely different person as of late!</p>

<p>You seem to criticize students who try and take 'gut' (easy) classes to fulfill their distributives... Yet not 4 months ago, you wrote me two page-long messages about the best gut classes to take your freshman fall. (And how you had wished you had known to do that, so you wouldn't have completely wrecked your GPA.)</p>

<p>You are, in fact, the only person at Dartmouth that has ever talked about gut classes with me. Maybe it is just because I'm a freshman, and people are still easily finding classes that they enjoy to fulfill their distributives, but still...</p>

<p>We understand that something about Dartmouth has set you off, but you would have your time better spent on your transfer app (or a plan B exit strategy). Regardless, I look forward to getting some update postings about how your transition fared, and whether or not your new school is as perfect for you as we hope it will be.</p>

<p>About the intellectual culture at Dartmouth...</p>

<p>A lot of the time people don't seem outwardly intellectual, because it is a social faux-pas to brag (self-call) about your accomplishments. I went to an elite high school, and I found the outward intellectualism to actually be really fake. It was so refreshing to be around people with whom I could carry a stimulating conversation that went beyond more than how awesome they are.</p>

<p>I would definitely agree with the fact that our type of intellectualism would not satisfy most people. It is completely understandable. So many people on this website have worked incredibly hard, and achieved incredible feats in the past 4+ years of their life. Coming to Dartmouth might make your previous accomplishments feel worthless if nobody is going to shower you in praise about them.</p>

<p>
[quote]
Sure intellectual discourse and intellectual people DO exist. In fact, my inner circle of friends mainly consists of those types of people

[/quote]

This kind of self-rightness attitude is not intellectual at all.

[quote]
I would suggest Chicago, Reed, Harvey Mudd, and Caltech as the ultimate intellectual schools in this country.

[/quote]

Hearsay. </p>

<p>
[quote]
you would have your time better spent on your transfer app (or a plan B exit strategy).

[/quote]

Good advice.</p>

<p>There is certainly an ethos at Dartmouth to be socially friendly, unpretentious and not "stuck up". This can be mistaken for a lack of interest in the intellectual. You will be able to find plenty of folks who will be willing to get into discussions about issues that don't interest 99% of the rest of the us until dawn and beyond.
Having spent half my adult life at the University of Chicago and working here now, there are plenty of students who hang their hats on their intellectualism almost as a defense mechanism. This is the only area in which some feel comfortable and accomplished. The percentage of students like this has dropped as the admissions rate has fallen from 70% toward 30% or so. The admissions office has been able to become more selective with the echo-boom generation and the overflow from the Ivy League.
If you actually ARE someone whose identity is tied up in intellectualism, please consider the Dartmouths, Williamses and Stanfords of the world.</p>

<p>aerialblue, why is it that every time you say something valid, you follow it up with something utterly unintelligent, as if to destroy the credibility of your semi-intelligent posts? Calling another poster "retarded" over and over is completely unnecessary (not to mention immature and politically incorrect), even if--gasp--they dare to disagree with you.</p>

<p>I agree with danas here. The reason our friends often seem more willing to engage in intellectual discussions is, simply, that they're friends who aren't afraid of being "too intellectual" or "nerdy." I, too, find myself more willing to talk about my own interests when I'm with my close friends; with strangers or acquaintances, I'm more reserved, listening more to what others have to say and trying to find common interests.</p>

<p>Since aerial is determined to annoy anyone from former floormates to workers at the Hop, I'll bail these couple paras out of my response to him in the other thread lest people overlook them in the flamewar:


</p>

<p>My sense is that different people have different ideas of what "intellectual" means. In the strict sense of talking about human psychology or arguing about the viability of the free market system or discussing what makes life meaningful, I would definitely say that I have found that kind of discussion at Dartmouth. Some people like aerial haven't.</p>

<p>However, I would say that the kind of "intellectual" discussions I have with my friends would bore quite a few people here. So yes, there is a certain strain of anti-intellectualism present. But that's present almost anywhere. I've visited HYP each a couple of times and I'd say the tenor there is more or less the same as it is at Dartmouth. Kids get drunk and do stupid things all the time. For a lot of people college isn't an intellectual experience so much as it is a time to experiment with freedom. That isn't to say you can't find people interested in more than random acts of drunkenness - I certainly found them my freshman year. Because everyone at Dartmouth is pretty smart, most of us are fully capable of holding forth on an intellectual subject that catches our eye.</p>

<p>I agree completely with everyone else that we at Dartmouth don't wear our intellects on our sleeves. It does annoy me at times that we feel uncomfortable talking about anything overtly intellectual unless we know the other person well, but I've had my fair share of conversations about intellectual topics here with my friends, and even with some acquaintances who I see often enough. I find many of the preprofessionals as annoying as the next person, but quite often they're fairly intellectual themselves (yes, I have had some stimulating conversations with preprofessionals).</p>

<p>But if you're the kind of person who is seriously thinking about a place like UChicago or Swarthmore, it's a good sign that Dartmouth may not be a good place for you. People here are smart, but the culture isn't conducive to meeting new people by launching into a discussion of the merits of minarchism, the rationale behind the 1798 Sedition Act, or the arguments for legalizing partial birth abortion. As I've said before, that's a plus to some, a neutral to some, and a minus to yet others. I'm just fine with this, as are most of the other people I know who like thinking about these things.</p>

<p>Also note that if you've decided that the difficulty in striking up these kinds of conversations on a casual basis is a major turn-off, most other top universities have pretty much the same issues. Sure, HYP don't party as hard as Dartmouth (when I went to Yale with some friends, there was much grouching about how there was nothing to do at 1AM), but party they do. There are a lot of people who wind up falling over each other drunk as hell. The thing is, Dartmouth being a small and rural school means you may not immediately find the right circle of friends for you, or the right kind of conversation. It's easier to do those things in a big school because there's just such a wider range of people to meet.</p>

<p>And kids, this is why you do your research before picking a school. When I applied to Dartmouth all I knew was that it was an Ivy, focused on undergrads, and students had a lot of fun. (All true.) By the time I decided on Dartmouth I knew a lot more about it and decided it was a worthwhile trade-off. I then came to Dartmouth and found out even more - freshman fall was a bit hard, but I came out of it pretty ok and happy. So far I've enjoyed my time here and adjusted well to Dartmouth life, and things have only gotten better as a sophomore. You need to think hard about what school fits best, and what kind of chances you're willing to take.</p>

<p>IMO Danas is one of the most consistently smart posters on CC. Don't think I've ready anything he/she wrote I disagree with, and the nail was hit on the head.</p>

<p>Aerial, since you didn't seem to hear the message from Yellowknife, I'll repeat it: Calling people retarded is not only not PC, but it's ignorant and not something thoughtful, intellectual people do.</p>

<p>


</p>

<p>TheDartmouth.com</a> | Don’t Tear Down the Choates</p>

<p>Objective Response: One Dartmouth writer literally saw this piece and said to us all, "How did this kid get into Dartmouth?"</p>

<p>Sigh, I hate to self-call, but if you're going to bring this up, hey, why not?</p>

<p>Political</a> tsunami : an end to hegemony in Malaysia? [WorldCat.org]
Religion</a> under siege? : Lina Joy, the Islamic state and freedom of faith [WorldCat.org]</p>

<p>Call me back when you've edited a volume or two about something besides retardation. Bonus points if you can get your Prime Minister or Parliamentary Opposition Leader to contribute to the edition.</p>

<p>Aerial why are you getting so feisty as of late? Didn't get into Columbia as a transfer?</p>

<p>Sorry to hear that. But seriously though, no need to rip on other people for your own bitter experience at what's a perfectly normal and enjoyable college. </p>

<p>I still think it's hilarious that you spend all of your time on CC posting negative posts about the school that you go to.</p>

<p>No, Dartmouth is not an intellectual school.</p>

<p>I once asked McNutt Hall about ontological imperatives, and all he said was:</p>

<p>"I'm not much for that sorta book learnin'"</p>

<p>This idea that a school isn't "intellectual" is as valid as an annoying and shallow girl that (why yes, I am intentionally using 'that') isn't pretty is useful.</p>

1 Like

<p>
[quote]
We understand that something about Dartmouth has set you off,

[/quote]
</p>

<p>It's hard to blame her, considering the administration unilaterally screws people over and favors the jocks and trust fund babies.</p>

<p>And while in general I think there is a fair bit of intellectualism going on at Dartmouth, its problem is that the above two groups have overrun it.</p>

<p>Wasn't the movie Animal House based on a Dartmouth frat?</p>

1 Like

<p>It was based mostly on Dartmouth's Alpha Delta and also WashU's Zeta Beta Tau chapter.</p>

<p>
[Quote]
Wasn't the movie Animal House based on a Dartmouth frat?

[/Quote]
</p>

<p>Lol... You seem to make pretty interesting comments for a CC senior advisor.</p>

<p>Hey, I might be old, but I love to laugh. :-)</p>