<p>virtuoso_735, </p>
<p>You can definitely self-study those tests and do well. I've self-studied 4 APs already, including Psych, and gotten 4's or 5's on all of them, so I will share my experience with you. </p>
<p>I crammed with the book SparkNotes Psychology 101 beginning 5 DAYS before the test. Knew very little about Psychology beforehand. Got a 4. You can virtually guarantee yourself a 5 if you start this early.</p>
<p>I highly recommend Psychology 101 by SparkNotes for anyone self studying Psych... everything that was in it was on the test. It is a short read (about 200 pages, and pocket sized), well organized, every chapter has bulleted, bold vocab and topic reviews so you can essentially skip the chapter, read only the review, and know everything. The chapters are very informative and to the point.</p>
<p>I didn't get the Barron's book for Psychology, but I got their books for a multitude of other subjects from Match Level 2 to European History, and I think I have enough experience with Barron's to say that Barron's truly sucks. </p>
<p>In a typical Barron's book, 50% of the content is stuff that is LITERALLY NEVER TESTED on the exam. I mean stuff that is not even on the test syllabus. Barron's throws in this junk to confuse you and give you the crappiest score possible on your first diagnostic test. Then as you work through the book and learn all this obscure crap no one needs to know, your scores (slowly) rise on their rediculously hard tests. By the time you've worked through the book, exhausted and severely humbled, you feel as though there is no chance in hell you can do well on the real test. This serves to fool students into thinking that Barron's is "comprehensive" and "prepared them well for a very hard test." Luckily for the Barron's student, he only needed 10% of the knowledge he acquired to do well on the exam. Unluckily, Barron's wasted his time teaching him the other 90%. If your time is worth anything to you, don't waste it on Barron's.</p>
<p>I have had good experiences self-studying with Peterson's, REA, SparkNotes, Cliff's, and with the thick textbooks used in college/high-school classes. But believe me, Barron's is not the way to go. </p>
<p>As far as Music Theory, I would highly recommend the following websites:
<a href="http://www.musictheory.net/%5B/url%5D">http://www.musictheory.net/</a>
<a href="http://www.dolmetsch.com/theoryintro.htm%5B/url%5D">http://www.dolmetsch.com/theoryintro.htm</a>
<a href="http://www.music.vt.edu/musicdictionary/%5B/url%5D">http://www.music.vt.edu/musicdictionary/</a>
<a href="http://www.emusictheory.com%5B/url%5D">http://www.emusictheory.com</a>
<a href="http://www.teoria.com/index.html%5B/url%5D">http://www.teoria.com/index.html</a></p>
<p>You really don't need a textbook for Theory. My class used Tonal Harmony by Kofka which is an extremely popular book, but I don't know why. I found it unfocused and verbose and it is written in what reads like parody of a pretentious academic's writing style. Plus half the book is material that is beyond the scope of the AP exam. Track down a book on writing counterpoint, and use that instead of Tonal Harmony. </p>
<p>Half of the test tests your knowledge of music vocabulary, and the other half tests how well trained your ear is. Learn to recognize common chord progressions, harmonizing, part writing and dictation, and you should be good. Also order the 2 released tests (with cassettes) from the CollegeBoard store. Practice with those and you can ace it, particularly if you have musical training already.</p>