<p>"The quality and type of undergrad institution will impact the quality of a student's college peer group, which is a huge influence. Your student will aspire to live up to their peers' standards, whoever they are. S/he will - intentionally or subconsciously - adopt many of their habits and behaviors." </p>
<p>That would be true if every student gravitated towards the median at their school. That's not exactly what happens. Top students at state schools definitely gravitate towards each other, especially at schools with strong Honors programs that encourage both socialization and academic excellence. It's like what Thumper said earlier: "At the end of the day, your child is not going to interact with 40,000 students at the state U. They are going to find a group of like minded peers with whom to interact."</p>
<p>But I don't mind hanging out with the other kinds of people either. Not everyone you meet in life will be "Ivy-educated" so it can't hurt to start dealing with those people now. Believe it or not, they might actually be pretty awesome people, even if their SAT scores and GPA aren't that high. Some of most brilliant intellectual people I've met are terrible students, but they just think that school gets in the way of their education. </p>
<p>So maybe the peer group at a state school won't consist of all the top-tier players on Wall Street or K street. That's fine. They will still produce many, many doctors, lawyers, local politicians, business owners, etc. who will be quite successful in life and probably several who will go on to succeed beyond even the "top-tier" school people. </p>
<p>I also want to correct the misconception that state schools offer fewer opportunities than private schools. That's simply not true. From my experience, state schools have far greater resource bases and are much more willing to share those resources with their top students. It depends on the school and student, but I'd argue that a self-motivated top student would do better at a state school than an Ivy League school simply because of the sheer number of leadership, research, and academic opportunities available to a big fish in a big pond. </p>
<p>Finally, from a financial standpoint, going to a state school on a scholarship opened up so many more opportunities than going to a private school. Having financial freedom allowed me to do crazy things like do field research in Africa over the summer, go on a cross-country geological roadtrip, and intern (unpaid) for a nonprofit instead of working a summer job. During the school year, I could focus on my academic work and social life rather than worrying about finances. This is not to denigrate people who have to work- it's definitely a good thing to do as well, but I'd imagine they'd rather be doing something else. Plus, now that I'm at the end of undergrad, I can have my pick of what I want to do for grad school and don't have to worry about the onerous weight of student loans (and my parents are much more willing to help me out too). </p>
<p>So is a private school education worth it? Only for students who believe they'll never succeed at a state school, because if they believe that then they certainly won't, or for students who are not self-motivated. For students who are open-minded and self-motivated, a state school experience is equally on par, if not superior to, a private school education.</p>