<p>MovieBuff, the statistics you cite are completely and utterly irrelevant for comparison purposes because New Haven has a uniquely small land area defined to be a part of its central municipality. The city was founded in 1638, so is one of the oldest European-settled cities in North America, and as a result, areas that are immediately adjacent to the city center are considered to be separate towns/cities, even when in reality they are not. Another way to look at it is that the municipality of New Haven covers only a few square miles, so a measure like yours is counting mostly college students and people living in older housing in the center (i.e., a lot of immigrants), whereas most American cities cover much larger areas over hundreds if not thousands of square miles (so statistically include mostly suburban areas and smaller proportions of students and immigrants, and obviously are not as densely settled). In other words, the only valid way to compare cities on the basis of US Census-defined urban areas (MSAs) - that's how the BEA and everyone else always compares them, because otherwise you are really comparing nothing that is meaningful. When you make a legitimate comparison with other cities, New Haven always shows up as one of the wealthiest and safest cities in the United States.</p>
<p>Newenglandparent, good post. It's interesting to hear the perspective of someone who has been there for a long time. Also, regarding homeless people, I think that it is important to remember that they generally congregate in the safest areas. The vast majority of homeless people come from suburban and rural areas originally, and have decided (or are unable to decide) not to seek help in the form of assisted housing, etc. They have decided to move to the center of cities because it is the only place that they can be safe. </p>
<p>Think about it, if you were a homeless person in the suburbs or some small town somewhere, you would be open to local kids attacking you, rednecks taking potshots at you, etc. You wouldn't fit in, and you would seriously suffer as a result. People in the suburbs wouldn't want you around because you would be lowering their property values, and as a result, you would be attacked. Pretty much every day until you finally left or were given a one-way police car ride to a nearby city by one of the local cops. You also wouldn't want to go to a high-crime neighborhood on the outskirts of town -- you would want to be where other people are. When there are other people around (as there are in vibrant, cutting-edge downtown areas like Downtown New Haven and Greenwich Village), then you are generally pretty safe. Bottom line, that is why homeless people concentrate in the areas considered to be safe urban areas -- places like Harvard Square, Downtown New Haven, Times Square, or Fanueil Hall in Boston, and not relatively boring, isolated places like Ithaca, Morningside Heights, Providence, West Philadelphia, small towns or the suburbs where they simply are not going to be safe. The problem is that that means that a non-homeless person probably isn't going to be very safe, either, unless they are huddled inside their car or house and sticking on their own property. But that's the story of the suburbs and other mediocre communities, and the reasons why vibrant urban places like Central Paris, Downtown Manhattan, the Chicago Loop, Downtown New Haven, Ann Arbor, Madison, Downtown Seattle, London, Rome, Prague, Milan, Northampton, and Downtown Boston are considered to be so desirable as places to live. </p>
<p>The other reason, as I said above, of course is that the greatest risk comes from driving. You are 100-200 times more likely to die in a random car crash than in any kind of random urban violence, unless you are a drug dealer or something. That being the case, cities (even incredibly dangerous ones like Baltimore) are actually "safer", statistically, than virtually anywhere else. It doesn't mean you shouldn't use street smarts, but it means that if you do, you'll be much better off in a city than you will anywhere else. Excepting, sadly, the threat of a major terrorist attack like 9/11 or worse.</p>