<p>This may sound like a dumb question, because this book is made up of "real SAT IIs" after all, but I just wanted to make sure that the book is not outdated. I have the Real SAT IIs book copyright 2000, and this book came with a Bio E/M test included in a special insert. Would this test and curve still be the most accurate way to judge the real test?</p>
<p>if anything most practice tests are harder than the actual SAT's (barrons) but from what i've heard the princeton review and sparknotes tests are most accurate. you can take the sparknotes one for free at sparknotes.com (you have to create a new account) </p>
<p>i would assume that its accurate since its a 'real sat' :P</p>
<p>be careful man.
The test is a bit out of date. The topics are are definately similar to the real thing, but the real test (at least) may had a bit more of a random feel to it. Some of the questions were kind of out of the blue and not really regular curriculum questions, but only 2-3 were not immediately obvious. Use real sat iis to get a rough sense of the real test. No other test can simulate the real test as well as real sats. But expect that the real test will be a little harder. Just a tad. But keep in mind, you will be concentrating harder and thinking better. That adrenaline pumping during a test isn't just for nothing.</p>
<p>thanks for the advice, that's what i expected</p>
<p>Just took the Real SAT for Bio. Got the same score for M and for E. Does anyone have any advice on which is usually easier? Also the real ii test seemed a lot easier than i expected.</p>
<p>good question, also interested</p>
<p>It was pretty accurate from my experience. I got an 800 on that book and an 800 on the actual test.</p>