Is the september act regularly harder?

<p>I took 19 practice act tests over the summer in preparation for this test and i noticed 2 things:</p>

<p>Math was pretty hard towards the end.. There were some questions on the test that I had never practiced before (for example: that graph with a negative parabola and abs value)</p>

<p>Science section was not made for humans.. Never seen a conflicting view point passage with experiments and data..</p>

<p>So I'm wondering - do they think people study over the summer and try to make it super tough?</p>

<p>Or do they think that high school seniors still have the a chance to take the october test so try and fail everyone to get them to retake it and get more money</p>

<p>Has anyone taken a past September ACT and thought it was harder than others? And is the october act easier than the september one?</p>

<p>I’ve taken the ACT a few times… I think that every section besides the science was easier than normal (reading a lot easier). Science, on the other hand, was just insane. It’s like they took the difficulty that they lost from the other three sections, multiplied it by 1000x, then added it to science.</p>

1 Like

<p>I agree wcclirl444 for sure.</p>

<p>English is always easy, so no change there. Math and Reading were both easier than usual, especially Reading. Science was abnormally difficult. Never seen anything like it.</p>

<p>I think they try to keep it equally difficult no matter what.</p>

<p>It’s harder due to the curve. Mainly due to all the seniors taking the test.</p>

<p>if they make science hard, then they’ll probably make reading/English easy. If science is easy, you can probably expect a hard reading and just a few hard math ?s</p>

<p>I took the ACT for the first time in June and then again last week. I thought this month’s ACT was overall actually easier than the one in June. English was a breezer, Math was about the same, Reading I actually finished on time (which is extremely rare for me), and Science was quite hard, but manageable compared to the one in June… that one was insanely hard. So no, I wouldn’t say the September one is the hardest, but that is just how I felt. There are rumors that the ACT test makers make the test harder in certain months than others, but I don’t think the difficulty of the test and the month it is given are correlated at all. The ACT test makers have to make them as equal as possible, because they have no way of knowing whether or not a certain test form will be “easier” for most people before they release it, until everyone has taken it and they calculate the percent distributions for each score.</p>

<p>Any of you know similar science some where which can be use for practice or test copy.</p>

<p>Can someone critique this essay? I need to know if it’s better to use more concrete examples to center my essay around or to use multiple good supports for an argument. I’m just not sure what is a better structure, so I went with using several ideas. I reiterate a lot of ideas, can someone help me on that as well? Thanks.</p>

<p>Prompt: some high schools, teachers have
considered allowing each student to choose
the books he or she will read for English
class rather than requiring all students in
class to read the same books. Some teachers
support such a policy because they think
students will greatly improve their reading
skills if they read books they find
interesting. Other teachers do not support
such a policy because they think that
students will learn more by participating in
class discussion with others who have read
the same books. In your opinion, should
each individual student be allowed to choose
the books he or she reads for English class?</p>

<p>Our future is compromised of two things: the kids growing up right now, and their education. Students who are studying behold the power to change our future politically, economically, and socially, and what impacts their knowledge more than their education? Ensuring a strong, focused curriculum for all students can help fortify their future endeavors. Reading books in English class can surprisingly have a huge impact, for books entail many ethereal ideas that kids can use. By standardizing a list of books that kids in English should read, schools will see their students becoming more determined and better leaders of the future.</p>

<p>Allowing students to choose their books only leads to distraction from the central English class topic. Why let students pick their favorite story tale and elaborate on that book, which they might have already read for an easy 100? Students should not be given the freedom to do in class for any book wanted, for they will digress into impartial fragments that don’t relate. For example, when in 7th grade, my group in English chose to read “The Lightning Thief” a Greek myth spin-off to discuss certain stock Greek elements and myths, but instead we got caught up in the romantic story of the two protagonists. This freedom to choose novels hindered the potential of our education. However, if kids want to read out of class, it is not a problem.</p>

<p>When a list of must-read books is given to a student, they are not given a list of books they can only read. They are allowed to stray away and read as much as they want outside of the class, and the list only provides a bare minimum for all students to read. It helps equalize the reading level across schools if all students are culturally aware of certain situations through reading as well. For example, private schools significantly are less aware of certain important novels from Shakespeare of Twain than public schools. This is due to how private school students do not require a reading list for their students to use, so they don’t get the same minimum reading achievements as public school students.</p>

<p>Though the arguments against students picking class books to read seems well supported, many others believe quite the opposite. Books required by schools promote fascism and less creativity for students! Why would following a boring standard of curriculum books inspire students to read more and grow smarter? Although people may have a point, by requiring lists, students still do get the chance to choose outside books they want to read, but just at home. If so inclined, they can even host out of school discussions about the book. Also, by choosing classic novels that teach a wide range of morals rather than just vague teen-culture books, school districts get more scrupulous graduates.</p>

<p>Even if an individual student doesn’t choose his or er own book to read in class, there are plenty of opportunities to read outside of the classroom. By having a district-mandated list of books, English classes allow for the more well-rounded student, less distraction from the discussion topic, more appropriate topics, and a more equal distribution of education among students. Though some may apprehend that it’s too late to change the school system and it might ruin students’ views of school, as Franklin D. Roosevelt once said," The only thing we have to fear is fear itself."</p>