<p>I’m about 99.9% I’m going to UCSD. Haha, I know nobody cares, but it feels so good to finally get some direction out of this entire, ridiculous process.</p>
<p>However, my dad isn’t too thrilled that I’m passing up Cal.</p>
<p>hey Newslang, what were some of your deciding factors? I am deciding between UCSD, UCD and Cal...going to admit day to see if that helps with my decision</p>
<p>She visited both schools three times, and even stayed in the dorms. She just thought that UCSD was unspirited and a little dull on the weekends. I guess she attended a basketball game and no one came :( She also attended a frat party at UCSD with a friend and the girls from the invited sorority were rude to her. At UCD everyone was really friendly, and she had a great time at the social events she attended. She observed classes and really liked the professors at UCD. She also really loves the college town environment, and is a sports fanatic. I really think it just comes down to what environment suits you best</p>
<p>Doc2B. Those are graduate school rankings, which should deter you, not encourage you. As an undergraduate, you should want attention. As a researcher, you should want to do more than wash test tubes.</p>
<p>Slorg, have to take issue with your statement. </p>
<p>You seem to be of the opinion that a top graduate program somehow impoverishes the undergraduate programs. Funny, then, that Universities with the top Graduate Engineering programs usually have the highest rankings for Undergrad Engineering too. </p>
<p>The graduate school rankings are one of the few ways to roughly guage the quality of specific undergraduate programs which are not included in the regular Undergrad rankings. I think it's reasonable to assume that CalTech's undergrad physics program (un-rated by US News) is going to be top notch since their Graduate programs is rated highly. Maybe you could explain how could it be otherwise? UPenn's Wharton School seems to be able to run a top UG and Grad business program simultaneously.</p>
<p>Following you line of thinking, I should choose to take Physics, Chem, English, etc, etc, from Universities with mediocre rankings in those graduate majors? Somehow that makes the Undergrad programs better?</p>
<p>joemama, the USNWR ranking are heavily biased toward donations, research, and selectivity. For instance, Harvey Mudd's undergraduate engineering program is way better than Berkeley's, despite Berkeley being rated 3rd behind MIT and Stanford.</p>
<p>However, the opposite of my earlier post is not true. Bad graduate schools don't indicate a good undergraduate education. Instead of graduate schools, rankings, and research, prospective undergrads should look at available resources, average class size, professor availability, etc.</p>
<p>UCSD has a better ranking and beach, both are conservative and summery and coastal and have great theatre programs. SLO is cheaper though and more farming based. UCSD is more biomed based...</p>