<p>Thanks for the link, ucb.</p>
<p>So, back to the OP; I really like the outcome-based methodology. It’s interesting to note that many of the usual suspects at the top of other rankings show up here too, suggesting that better inputs (incoming students) result in better outcomes. Not that surprising.</p>
<p>I’m less familiar with the LACs, but there are a few RUs that rank highly on, e.g., the USNWR rankings but not in this ranking methodology. That I find that interesting. What’s happening at Vandy and WUSTL, for example? The kids have the stats, but they lack that “something extra” that the Ivies seek out?</p>