<p>"The College Board said students without learning disabilities did not show any marked improvement in scores when given extra time"</p>
<p>How much extra time. We are supposed to believe random students given 6 or 7 hours to complete an SAT 1 test - would not show "marked" improvement? THEN give everyone double time</p>
<p>How does ETS define "marked" improvement?</p>
<p>The facts are: ETS is holding back their detailed stats on time accomodated students - so such generalized statements such as that have no meaning at all</p>
<p>On the SAT 11 Chem test last month - double or triple time certainly would have been a plus because many test takers simply didn't have time to answer all the questions and THATS why its being put in this context in this thread</p>